vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CALERES INC (CAL) and Global Business Travel Group, Inc. (GBTG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Global Business Travel Group, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($792.0M vs $790.1M, roughly 1.0× CALERES INC). Global Business Travel Group, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 10.5% vs 0.3%, a 10.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Global Business Travel Group, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (34.0% vs 6.6%). Global Business Travel Group, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($13.0M vs $-12.4M). Over the past eight quarters, Global Business Travel Group, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (13.9% CAGR vs 6.5%).
Caleres Inc. is an American footwear company that owns and operates a variety of footwear brands. Its headquarters is located in Clayton, Missouri, a suburb of St. Louis. The company was founded in 1878 as Bryan, Brown & Company in St. Louis, though it underwent several name changes. The Hamilton-Brown Shoe Company was the largest manufacturer of shoes in America in the early 20th century, but it went bankrupt in June 1939.
A travel management company (TMC) is a travel agency which manages organizations' corporate or business travel programs. Such companies will often provide an end-user online booking tool, mobile application, program management, and consulting teams, executive travel services, meetings and events support, reporting functionality, duty of care, and more. Non-Profit travel management companies also provide services to manage complex visa requirements, pre-trip medical needs, remote area travel, ...
CAL vs GBTG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $790.1M | $792.0M |
| Net Profit | $2.4M | $83.0M |
| Gross Margin | 41.8% | — |
| Operating Margin | 1.5% | 3.7% |
| Net Margin | 0.3% | 10.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.6% | 34.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -94.2% | 692.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.07 | $0.16 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $790.1M | $792.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $658.5M | $674.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $614.2M | $631.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $639.2M | $621.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $740.9M | $591.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $683.3M | $597.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $659.2M | $625.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $697.1M | $610.0M |
| Q4 25 | $2.4M | $83.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.7M | $-62.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.9M | $15.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.9M | $75.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $41.4M | $-14.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $30.0M | $-128.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.9M | $27.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $55.7M | $-19.0M |
| Q4 25 | 41.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 43.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 45.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 43.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 44.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 45.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 46.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 43.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.5% | 3.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.9% | 5.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 8.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.7% | 5.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.2% | 4.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.5% | 6.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.4% | 2.6% |
| Q4 25 | 0.3% | 10.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.0% | -9.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.8% | 12.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.6% | -2.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.4% | -21.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.0% | -3.1% |
| Q4 25 | $0.07 | $0.16 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.20 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.21 | $0.03 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.17 | $0.16 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.19 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.85 | $-0.28 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.88 | $0.06 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.56 | $-0.04 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $34.0M | $434.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $1.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $616.8M | $1.6B |
| Total Assets | $2.1B | $4.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.88× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $34.0M | $434.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $191.5M | $427.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.1M | $601.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $29.6M | $552.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $33.7M | $536.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.8M | $524.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.7M | $515.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $21.4M | $475.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $616.8M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $613.3M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $605.2M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $599.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $598.3M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $606.1M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $570.3M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $560.6M | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $4.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $4.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $3.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $3.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $3.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $3.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | $3.8B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.88× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.91× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.15× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.23× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.32× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.26× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-1.2M | $52.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-12.4M | $13.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -1.6% | 1.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.4% | 4.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.50× | 0.63× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $14.4M | $104.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-1.2M | $52.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $47.3M | $71.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.7M | $57.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.7M | $53.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-39.8M | $65.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.6M | $85.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $36.1M | $73.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $43.0M | $49.0M |
| Q4 25 | $-12.4M | $13.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.0M | $38.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-26.2M | $27.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.0M | $26.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-57.4M | $33.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $68.5M | $59.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.3M | $49.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $32.4M | $24.0M |
| Q4 25 | -1.6% | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.3% | 5.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -4.3% | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.8% | 4.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -7.7% | 5.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.0% | 9.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.6% | 3.9% |
| Q4 25 | 1.4% | 4.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.9% | 4.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.3% | 4.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.7% | 4.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.4% | 5.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.6% | 4.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.5% | 3.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | 4.1% |
| Q4 25 | -0.50× | 0.63× | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.05× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.81× | 3.80× | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.82× | 0.71× | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.96× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.66× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.17× | 2.70× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.77× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CAL
| Brand Portfolio | $383.7M | 49% |
| Landed Wholesale | $148.1M | 19% |
| Wholesale E Commerce | $75.0M | 9% |
| Ecommerce | $68.8M | 9% |
| Stuart Weitzman Brand | $45.8M | 6% |
| Landed Wholesale Ecommerce Drop Ship | $30.6M | 4% |
| First Cost Wholesale | $14.9M | 2% |
| Clt Brand Solutions | $10.2M | 1% |
| License And Royalty | $2.1M | 0% |
GBTG
| Travel | $620.0M | 78% |
| Other | $172.0M | 22% |
