vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CALERES INC (CAL) and LOGITECH INTERNATIONAL S.A. (LOGI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
LOGITECH INTERNATIONAL S.A. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.4B vs $790.1M, roughly 1.8× CALERES INC). LOGITECH INTERNATIONAL S.A. runs the higher net margin — 17.7% vs 0.3%, a 17.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CALERES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.6% vs 6.1%). LOGITECH INTERNATIONAL S.A. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($465.6M vs $-12.4M). Over the past eight quarters, LOGITECH INTERNATIONAL S.A.'s revenue compounded faster (18.5% CAGR vs 6.5%).
Caleres Inc. is an American footwear company that owns and operates a variety of footwear brands. Its headquarters is located in Clayton, Missouri, a suburb of St. Louis. The company was founded in 1878 as Bryan, Brown & Company in St. Louis, though it underwent several name changes. The Hamilton-Brown Shoe Company was the largest manufacturer of shoes in America in the early 20th century, but it went bankrupt in June 1939.
Logitech International S.A. is a Swiss multinational manufacturer of computer peripherals and software. Headquartered in Lausanne, Switzerland, the company has offices throughout Europe, Asia, Oceania, and the Americas. It is a component of the Swiss Market Index, and is listed on the Nasdaq.
CAL vs LOGI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $790.1M | $1.4B |
| Net Profit | $2.4M | $251.0M |
| Gross Margin | 41.8% | 43.2% |
| Operating Margin | 1.5% | 20.1% |
| Net Margin | 0.3% | 17.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.6% | 6.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -94.2% | 25.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.07 | $1.69 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $790.1M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $658.5M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $614.2M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $639.2M | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $740.9M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $683.3M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $659.2M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $697.1M | $1.0B |
| Q4 25 | $2.4M | $251.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.7M | $170.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.9M | $146.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.9M | $144.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $41.4M | $200.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $30.0M | $145.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.9M | $141.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $55.7M | $167.6M |
| Q4 25 | 41.8% | 43.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 43.4% | 43.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 45.4% | 41.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 43.0% | 43.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 44.1% | 42.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 45.5% | 43.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 46.9% | 42.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 43.9% | 43.2% |
| Q4 25 | 1.5% | 20.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | 16.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.9% | 14.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 10.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.7% | 17.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.2% | 14.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.5% | 14.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.4% | 12.9% |
| Q4 25 | 0.3% | 17.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.0% | 14.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | 12.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.8% | 14.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.6% | 14.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.4% | 13.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | 13.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.0% | 16.6% |
| Q4 25 | $0.07 | $1.69 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.20 | $1.15 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.21 | $0.98 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.17 | $0.94 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.19 | $1.32 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.85 | $0.95 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.88 | $0.92 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.56 | $1.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $34.0M | $1.8B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $616.8M | $2.3B |
| Total Assets | $2.1B | $4.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $34.0M | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $191.5M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.1M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $29.6M | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $33.7M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.8M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.7M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $21.4M | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | $616.8M | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $613.3M | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $605.2M | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $599.0M | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $598.3M | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $606.1M | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $570.3M | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $560.6M | $2.2B |
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $4.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $3.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $3.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $3.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $3.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $3.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | $3.6B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-1.2M | $480.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-12.4M | $465.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -1.6% | 32.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.4% | 1.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.50× | 1.91× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $14.4M | $903.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-1.2M | $480.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $47.3M | $228.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.7M | $125.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.7M | $129.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-39.8M | $370.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.6M | $166.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $36.1M | $176.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $43.0M | $239.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-12.4M | $465.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.0M | $212.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-26.2M | $108.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.0M | $116.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-57.4M | $356.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $68.5M | $151.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.3M | $161.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $32.4M | $228.8M |
| Q4 25 | -1.6% | 32.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.3% | 17.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -4.3% | 9.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.8% | 11.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -7.7% | 26.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.0% | 13.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | 14.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.6% | 22.6% |
| Q4 25 | 1.4% | 1.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.9% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.3% | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.7% | 1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.4% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.6% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.5% | 1.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | 1.0% |
| Q4 25 | -0.50× | 1.91× | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.05× | 1.34× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.81× | 0.86× | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.82× | 0.90× | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.96× | 1.85× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.66× | 1.14× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.17× | 1.24× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.77× | 1.43× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CAL
| Brand Portfolio | $383.7M | 49% |
| Landed Wholesale | $148.1M | 19% |
| Wholesale E Commerce | $75.0M | 9% |
| Ecommerce | $68.8M | 9% |
| Stuart Weitzman Brand | $45.8M | 6% |
| Landed Wholesale Ecommerce Drop Ship | $30.6M | 4% |
| First Cost Wholesale | $14.9M | 2% |
| Clt Brand Solutions | $10.2M | 1% |
| License And Royalty | $2.1M | 0% |
LOGI
| Retail Gaming | $482.7M | 34% |
| Retail Keyboards Desktops | $254.6M | 18% |
| Retail Pointing Devices | $241.2M | 17% |
| Retail Video Collaboration | $193.3M | 14% |
| Retail Tablet And Other Accessories | $93.6M | 7% |
| Retail Webcams | $82.3M | 6% |
| Retail Headsets | $45.9M | 3% |
| Other Retail Products | $28.0M | 2% |
