vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CALERES INC (CAL) and OCEANEERING INTERNATIONAL INC (OII). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CALERES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($790.1M vs $692.4M, roughly 1.1× OCEANEERING INTERNATIONAL INC). OCEANEERING INTERNATIONAL INC runs the higher net margin — 5.2% vs 0.3%, a 4.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CALERES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.6% vs 3.6%). CALERES INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-12.4M vs $-76.5M). Over the past eight quarters, CALERES INC's revenue compounded faster (6.5% CAGR vs 1.8%).
Caleres Inc. is an American footwear company that owns and operates a variety of footwear brands. Its headquarters is located in Clayton, Missouri, a suburb of St. Louis. The company was founded in 1878 as Bryan, Brown & Company in St. Louis, though it underwent several name changes. The Hamilton-Brown Shoe Company was the largest manufacturer of shoes in America in the early 20th century, but it went bankrupt in June 1939.
Oceaneering International, Inc. is a subsea engineering and applied technology company based in Houston, Texas, U.S. that provides engineered services and hardware to customers who operate in marine, space, and other environments.
CAL vs OII — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $790.1M | $692.4M |
| Net Profit | $2.4M | $36.1M |
| Gross Margin | 41.8% | — |
| Operating Margin | 1.5% | — |
| Net Margin | 0.3% | 5.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.6% | 3.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -94.2% | -28.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.07 | $0.36 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $692.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $790.1M | $668.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $658.5M | $742.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $614.2M | $698.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $639.2M | $674.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $740.9M | $713.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $683.3M | $679.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $659.2M | $668.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | $36.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.4M | $177.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.7M | $71.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.9M | $54.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.9M | $50.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $41.4M | $56.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $30.0M | $41.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.9M | $35.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 41.8% | 19.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 43.4% | 20.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 45.4% | 21.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 43.0% | 20.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 44.1% | 19.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 45.5% | 19.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 46.9% | 18.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.5% | 9.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.9% | 11.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 10.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.7% | 10.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.2% | 10.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.5% | 9.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | 5.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.3% | 26.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.0% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.8% | 7.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.6% | 7.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.4% | 6.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | 5.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.36 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.07 | $1.75 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.20 | $0.71 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.21 | $0.54 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.17 | $0.49 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.19 | $0.55 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.85 | $0.40 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.88 | $0.34 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $34.0M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $488.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $616.8M | $1.1B |
| Total Assets | $2.1B | $2.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.44× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $34.0M | $695.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $191.5M | $7.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.1M | $7.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $29.6M | $7.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $33.7M | $504.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.7M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $488.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $487.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $482.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $616.8M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $613.3M | $907.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $605.2M | $842.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $599.0M | $773.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $598.3M | $714.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $606.1M | $698.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $570.3M | $651.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $2.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.44× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.46× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.67× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-1.2M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-12.4M | $-76.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -1.6% | -11.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.4% | 2.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.50× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $14.4M | $238.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-1.2M | $221.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $47.3M | $101.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.7M | $77.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.7M | $-80.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-39.8M | $128.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.6M | $91.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $36.1M | $52.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-76.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-12.4M | $190.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.0M | $77.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-26.2M | $46.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.0M | $-106.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-57.4M | $94.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $68.5M | $67.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.3M | $29.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | -11.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | -1.6% | 28.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.3% | 10.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -4.3% | 6.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.8% | -15.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -7.7% | 13.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.0% | 9.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | 4.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.4% | 4.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.9% | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.3% | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.7% | 3.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.4% | 4.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.6% | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.5% | 3.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.50× | 1.24× | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.05× | 1.42× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.81× | 1.42× | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.82× | -1.60× | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.96× | 2.29× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.66× | 2.23× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.17× | 1.50× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CAL
| Brand Portfolio | $383.7M | 49% |
| Landed Wholesale | $148.1M | 19% |
| Wholesale E Commerce | $75.0M | 9% |
| Ecommerce | $68.8M | 9% |
| Stuart Weitzman Brand | $45.8M | 6% |
| Landed Wholesale Ecommerce Drop Ship | $30.6M | 4% |
| First Cost Wholesale | $14.9M | 2% |
| Clt Brand Solutions | $10.2M | 1% |
| License And Royalty | $2.1M | 0% |
OII
Segment breakdown not available.
