vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CALERES INC (CAL) and PJT Partners Inc. (PJT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CALERES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($790.1M vs $531.4M, roughly 1.5× PJT Partners Inc.). PJT Partners Inc. runs the higher net margin — 10.0% vs 0.3%, a 9.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, PJT Partners Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.9% vs 6.6%). PJT Partners Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($138.6M vs $-12.4M). Over the past eight quarters, PJT Partners Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (27.5% CAGR vs 6.5%).
Caleres Inc. is an American footwear company that owns and operates a variety of footwear brands. Its headquarters is located in Clayton, Missouri, a suburb of St. Louis. The company was founded in 1878 as Bryan, Brown & Company in St. Louis, though it underwent several name changes. The Hamilton-Brown Shoe Company was the largest manufacturer of shoes in America in the early 20th century, but it went bankrupt in June 1939.
PJT Partners, Inc. is a global advisory-focused investment bank, founded in October 2015 as part of The Blackstone Group's spin-off of its financial and strategic advisory services businesses.
CAL vs PJT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $790.1M | $531.4M |
| Net Profit | $2.4M | $53.4M |
| Gross Margin | 41.8% | — |
| Operating Margin | 1.5% | 23.1% |
| Net Margin | 0.3% | 10.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.6% | 12.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -94.2% | 4.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.07 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $790.1M | $531.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $658.5M | $442.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $614.2M | $401.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $639.2M | $321.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $740.9M | $470.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $683.3M | $320.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $659.2M | $358.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $697.1M | $327.1M |
| Q4 25 | $2.4M | $53.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.7M | $39.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.9M | $32.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.9M | $54.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $41.4M | $51.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $30.0M | $22.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.9M | $28.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $55.7M | $32.6M |
| Q4 25 | 41.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 43.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 45.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 43.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 44.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 45.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 46.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 43.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.5% | 23.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | 20.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.9% | 19.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 16.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.7% | 21.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.2% | 15.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.5% | 18.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.4% | 16.5% |
| Q4 25 | 0.3% | 10.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.0% | 9.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | 8.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.8% | 16.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.6% | 10.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.4% | 6.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | 7.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.0% | 10.0% |
| Q4 25 | $0.07 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.20 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.21 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.17 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.19 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.85 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.88 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.56 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $34.0M | $538.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $616.8M | $308.2M |
| Total Assets | $2.1B | $1.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $34.0M | $538.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $191.5M | $400.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.1M | $214.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $29.6M | $194.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $33.7M | $483.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.8M | $148.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.7M | $164.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $21.4M | $215.5M |
| Q4 25 | $616.8M | $308.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $613.3M | $228.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $605.2M | $167.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $599.0M | $148.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $598.3M | $187.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $606.1M | $159.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $570.3M | $133.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $560.6M | $174.6M |
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | $1.3B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-1.2M | $155.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-12.4M | $138.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -1.6% | 26.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.4% | 3.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.50× | 2.92× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $14.4M | $480.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-1.2M | $155.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $47.3M | $256.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.7M | $190.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.7M | $-75.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-39.8M | $195.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.6M | $180.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $36.1M | $193.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $43.0M | $-38.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-12.4M | $138.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.0M | $240.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-26.2M | $178.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.0M | $-77.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-57.4M | $195.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $68.5M | $178.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.3M | $193.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $32.4M | $-39.2M |
| Q4 25 | -1.6% | 26.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.3% | 54.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -4.3% | 44.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.8% | -24.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -7.7% | 41.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.0% | 55.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | 53.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.6% | -12.0% |
| Q4 25 | 1.4% | 3.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.9% | 3.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.3% | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.7% | 0.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.4% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.6% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.5% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | 0.1% |
| Q4 25 | -0.50× | 2.92× | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.05× | 6.43× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.81× | 5.79× | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.82× | -1.41× | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.96× | 3.81× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.66× | 8.15× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.17× | 6.84× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.77× | -1.19× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CAL
| Brand Portfolio | $383.7M | 49% |
| Landed Wholesale | $148.1M | 19% |
| Wholesale E Commerce | $75.0M | 9% |
| Ecommerce | $68.8M | 9% |
| Stuart Weitzman Brand | $45.8M | 6% |
| Landed Wholesale Ecommerce Drop Ship | $30.6M | 4% |
| First Cost Wholesale | $14.9M | 2% |
| Clt Brand Solutions | $10.2M | 1% |
| License And Royalty | $2.1M | 0% |
PJT
Segment breakdown not available.