vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CALERES INC (CAL) and RANGE RESOURCES CORP (RRC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CALERES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($790.1M vs $786.9M, roughly 1.0× RANGE RESOURCES CORP). RANGE RESOURCES CORP runs the higher net margin — 22.8% vs 0.3%, a 22.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, RANGE RESOURCES CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (18.0% vs 6.6%). Over the past eight quarters, RANGE RESOURCES CORP's revenue compounded faster (14.6% CAGR vs 6.5%).
Caleres Inc. is an American footwear company that owns and operates a variety of footwear brands. Its headquarters is located in Clayton, Missouri, a suburb of St. Louis. The company was founded in 1878 as Bryan, Brown & Company in St. Louis, though it underwent several name changes. The Hamilton-Brown Shoe Company was the largest manufacturer of shoes in America in the early 20th century, but it went bankrupt in June 1939.
Range Resources Corporation is a natural gas exploration and production company, the headquartered is in Fort Worth, Texas. It operates in the Marcellus Formation, where it is the largest land owners.
CAL vs RRC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $790.1M | $786.9M |
| Net Profit | $2.4M | $179.1M |
| Gross Margin | 41.8% | 94.5% |
| Operating Margin | 1.5% | — |
| Net Margin | 0.3% | 22.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.6% | 18.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -94.2% | 88.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.07 | $0.75 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $790.1M | $786.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $658.5M | $655.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $614.2M | $699.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $639.2M | $846.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $740.9M | $667.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $683.3M | $567.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $659.2M | $513.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $697.1M | $598.8M |
| Q4 25 | $2.4M | $179.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.7M | $144.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.9M | $237.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.9M | $97.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $41.4M | $94.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $30.0M | $50.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.9M | $28.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $55.7M | $92.1M |
| Q4 25 | 41.8% | 94.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 43.4% | 92.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 45.4% | 95.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 43.0% | 93.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 44.1% | 93.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 45.5% | 94.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 46.9% | 93.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 43.9% | 94.7% |
| Q4 25 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.3% | 22.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.0% | 22.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | 34.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.8% | 11.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.6% | 14.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.4% | 8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | 5.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.0% | 15.4% |
| Q4 25 | $0.07 | $0.75 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.20 | $0.60 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.21 | $0.99 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.17 | $0.40 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.19 | $0.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.85 | $0.21 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.88 | $0.12 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.56 | $0.38 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $34.0M | $204.0K |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $1.2B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $616.8M | $4.3B |
| Total Assets | $2.1B | $7.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.28× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $34.0M | $204.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $191.5M | $175.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.1M | $134.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $29.6M | $344.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $33.7M | $304.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.8M | $277.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.7M | $251.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $21.4M | $343.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.8B |
| Q4 25 | $616.8M | $4.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $613.3M | $4.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $605.2M | $4.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $599.0M | $3.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $598.3M | $3.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $606.1M | $3.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $570.3M | $3.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $560.6M | $3.8B |
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $7.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $7.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $7.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $7.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $7.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $7.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $7.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | $7.4B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.28× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.29× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.29× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.43× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.43× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.44× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.44× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.46× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-1.2M | $257.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-12.4M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -1.6% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.4% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.50× | 1.44× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $14.4M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-1.2M | $257.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $47.3M | $247.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.7M | $336.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.7M | $330.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-39.8M | $217.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.6M | $245.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $36.1M | $148.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $43.0M | $331.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-12.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-26.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-57.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $68.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $32.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | -1.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -4.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -7.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | -0.50× | 1.44× | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.05× | 1.72× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.81× | 1.42× | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.82× | 3.40× | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.96× | 2.30× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.66× | 4.85× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.17× | 5.18× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.77× | 3.60× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CAL
| Brand Portfolio | $383.7M | 49% |
| Landed Wholesale | $148.1M | 19% |
| Wholesale E Commerce | $75.0M | 9% |
| Ecommerce | $68.8M | 9% |
| Stuart Weitzman Brand | $45.8M | 6% |
| Landed Wholesale Ecommerce Drop Ship | $30.6M | 4% |
| First Cost Wholesale | $14.9M | 2% |
| Clt Brand Solutions | $10.2M | 1% |
| License And Royalty | $2.1M | 0% |
RRC
| Natural Gas Natural Gas Liquids And Oil Sales | $745.5M | 95% |
| Brokered Natural Gas And Marketing | $41.3M | 5% |
