vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Canaan Inc. (CAN) and Performance Shipping Inc. (PSHG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Performance Shipping Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($39.5M vs $20.8M, roughly 1.9× Canaan Inc.). Performance Shipping Inc. runs the higher net margin — 97.5% vs -18.4%, a 116.0% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Canaan Inc., doing business as Canaan Creative and known simply as Canaan, is a Singapore-based computer hardware manufacturer. Established in 2013 by N.G. Zhang, Canaan specializes in Blockchain servers and ASIC microprocessors for use in bitcoin mining.
Azerbaijan Caspian Shipping Closed Joint-Stock Company is a state-owned Azerbaijani shipping company. It is also known by its Russian-derived abbreviation CASPAR.
CAN vs PSHG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $20.8M | $39.5M |
| Net Profit | $-3.8M | $38.5M |
| Gross Margin | 99.9% | — |
| Operating Margin | -15.9% | 93.3% |
| Net Margin | -18.4% | 97.5% |
| Revenue YoY | — | -7.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 78.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.05 | $1.00 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $20.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.4M | $39.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.8M | $42.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-3.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-11.9M | $38.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-10.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.4M | $21.6M |
| Q4 25 | 99.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 99.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 99.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 99.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 99.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | -15.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -27.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -45.5% | 93.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -77.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -193.9% | 49.1% |
| Q4 25 | -18.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -11.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -104.4% | 97.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -102.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -112.3% | 50.4% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.05 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.02 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.25 | $1.00 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.55 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $95.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $6.2M | $43.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $52.4M | $312.8M |
| Total Assets | $92.5M | $363.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.12× | 0.14× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $95.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $61.7M |
| Q4 25 | $6.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.2M | $43.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $51.2M |
| Q4 25 | $52.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $44.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.8M | $312.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $43.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $56.8M | $254.0M |
| Q4 25 | $92.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $81.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $78.0M | $363.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $69.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $73.7M | $310.5M |
| Q4 25 | 0.12× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.14× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.18× | 0.14× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.20× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $26.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 0.70× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $26.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $31.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.70× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.47× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.