vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Performance Shipping Inc. (PSHG) and OceanPal Inc. (SVRN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Performance Shipping Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($39.5M vs $13.3M, roughly 3.0× OceanPal Inc.). Performance Shipping Inc. runs the higher net margin — 97.5% vs -62.9%, a 160.4% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Azerbaijan Caspian Shipping Closed Joint-Stock Company is a state-owned Azerbaijani shipping company. It is also known by its Russian-derived abbreviation CASPAR.
Ocean Software Limited was a British software development company that became one of the biggest European video game developers and publishers of the 1980s and 1990s.
PSHG vs SVRN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2024
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $39.5M | $13.3M |
| Net Profit | $38.5M | $-8.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 93.3% | -62.3% |
| Net Margin | 97.5% | -62.9% |
| Revenue YoY | -7.9% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 78.1% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.00 | $32.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q2 25 | $39.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $13.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $42.9M | — |
| Q2 25 | $38.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-8.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.6M | — |
| Q2 25 | 93.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -62.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 49.1% | — |
| Q2 25 | 97.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -62.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 50.4% | — |
| Q2 25 | $1.00 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $32.11 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.55 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $95.8M | $7.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $43.7M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $312.8M | $84.4M |
| Total Assets | $363.8M | $89.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.14× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 25 | $95.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $7.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $61.7M | — |
| Q2 25 | $43.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $51.2M | — |
| Q2 25 | $312.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $84.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $254.0M | — |
| Q2 25 | $363.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $89.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $310.5M | — |
| Q2 25 | 0.14× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.20× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $26.8M | $-3.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-22.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -169.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 142.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.70× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 25 | $26.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-3.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.7M | — |
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-22.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -169.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 142.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | — |
| Q2 25 | 0.70× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.47× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
