vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Canaan Inc. (CAN) and DNA X, Inc. (SONM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Canaan Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($20.8M vs $16.2M, roughly 1.3× DNA X, Inc.). Canaan Inc. runs the higher net margin — -18.4% vs -29.3%, a 10.9% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Canaan Inc., doing business as Canaan Creative and known simply as Canaan, is a Singapore-based computer hardware manufacturer. Established in 2013 by N.G. Zhang, Canaan specializes in Blockchain servers and ASIC microprocessors for use in bitcoin mining.
CAN vs SONM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $20.8M | $16.2M |
| Net Profit | $-3.8M | $-4.8M |
| Gross Margin | 99.9% | 11.2% |
| Operating Margin | -15.9% | -24.5% |
| Net Margin | -18.4% | -29.3% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 7.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -89.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.05 | $-4.83 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $20.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.8M | $16.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.4M | $11.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $16.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $15.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.2M | $15.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.8M | $11.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $9.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-3.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.5M | $-4.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-11.9M | $-7.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $458.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-21.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-10.4M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.4M | $-6.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-2.9M |
| Q4 25 | 99.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 99.9% | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 99.9% | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 50.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -1.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 99.9% | 28.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 99.8% | 25.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 31.8% |
| Q4 25 | -15.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -27.0% | -24.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -45.5% | -60.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 55.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -77.2% | -15.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -193.9% | -56.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -29.5% |
| Q4 25 | -18.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -11.0% | -29.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -104.4% | -66.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -141.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -102.7% | -16.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -112.3% | -57.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -31.9% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.05 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.02 | $-4.83 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.25 | $-0.79 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-116.99 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-9.32 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-1.41 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.65 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $2.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $6.2M | $5.1M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $52.4M | $-701.0K |
| Total Assets | $92.5M | $40.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.12× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $9.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $9.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $9.3M |
| Q4 25 | $6.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.2M | $5.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.2M | $2.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $52.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $44.7M | $-701.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.8M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-1.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-5.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $43.6M | $15.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $56.8M | $17.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $19.8M |
| Q4 25 | $92.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $81.7M | $40.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $78.0M | $36.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $36.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $39.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $69.3M | $49.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $73.7M | $45.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $42.4M |
| Q4 25 | 0.12× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.14× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.18× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-7.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-7.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-4.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-9.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-4.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-417.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-3.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-168.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-4.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-554.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-3.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-198.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -29.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -3.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -29.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -2.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -20.97× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
