vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Captivision Inc. (CAPT) and Enovix Corp (ENVX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Captivision Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($15.3M vs $11.3M, roughly 1.4× Enovix Corp). Captivision Inc. runs the higher net margin — -60.7% vs -310.6%, a 249.9% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Enovix Corp is an advanced battery technology company that designs, develops and manufactures high-energy-density 3D silicon anode lithium-ion batteries. Its products serve consumer electronics, wearable devices, electric vehicles, and renewable energy storage segments, with customers and operations across North America, Asia and Europe.
CAPT vs ENVX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2024 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $15.3M | $11.3M |
| Net Profit | $-9.3M | $-35.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 22.2% |
| Operating Margin | -49.3% | -390.5% |
| Net Margin | -60.7% | -310.6% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 15.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 6.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.14 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $11.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $8.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $7.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $5.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $9.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.3M | $3.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $5.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-35.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-53.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-44.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-23.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-37.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-22.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-9.3M | $-115.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-46.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 22.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 17.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 26.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 10.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -14.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -17.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -34.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | -390.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -587.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -585.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -834.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -355.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -1141.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -49.3% | -2355.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -1330.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | -310.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -672.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -596.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -461.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -385.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -522.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -60.7% | -3075.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -879.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.14 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.27 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.22 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.12 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.00 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.28 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.63 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.28 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $512.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $519.5M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $271.2M |
| Total Assets | — | $879.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.92× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $512.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $558.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $203.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $248.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $272.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $200.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $249.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $262.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | $519.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $518.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $169.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $169.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $170.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $168.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $170.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $169.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $271.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $294.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $203.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $235.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $246.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $167.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $170.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $229.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $879.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $913.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $469.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $499.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $527.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $448.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $489.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $508.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.92× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.76× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.83× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.72× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.69× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.01× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.00× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.74× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-27.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-28.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -248.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 8.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-113.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-27.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-25.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-25.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-16.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-16.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-30.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-26.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-35.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-28.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-28.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-33.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-23.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-32.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-50.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-52.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-50.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | -248.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -356.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -453.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -454.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -332.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -1163.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -1384.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -950.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 8.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 37.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 106.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 123.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 168.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 452.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 669.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 286.2% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
