vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP (CATY) and HUTCHMED (China) Ltd (HCM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
HUTCHMED (China) Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($270.8M vs $222.8M, roughly 1.2× CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP). CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP runs the higher net margin — 653.4% vs 0.7%, a 652.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (19.5% vs -16.5%). CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($363.7M vs $3.4M).
Cathay General Bancorp is a U.S.-headquartered bank holding company that operates Cathay Bank, offering full-spectrum commercial and personal banking services. It primarily serves Asian American communities and small-to-medium enterprises across major U.S. states including California, New York and Texas, as well as select Asian markets, with products covering deposits, loans, and wealth management solutions.
HUTCHMED (China) LtdHCMEarnings & Financial Report
HUTCHMED (China) Ltd is a biopharmaceutical firm focused on discovering, developing and commercializing targeted and immunotherapies for oncology and immunological diseases. It operates across China and global markets, with multiple marketed oncology drugs and a robust pipeline of late-stage clinical candidates addressing unmet patient needs.
CATY vs HCM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $222.8M | $270.8M |
| Net Profit | $90.5M | $2.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 37.7% |
| Operating Margin | 50.9% | -13.2% |
| Net Margin | 653.4% | 0.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 19.5% | -16.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 12.9% | -83.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.33 | $0.00 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $222.8M | $270.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $210.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $196.6M | $277.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $187.8M | $324.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $186.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $189.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $178.5M | $305.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $175.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $90.5M | $2.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $77.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $77.5M | $455.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $69.5M | $11.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $80.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $67.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $66.8M | $25.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $71.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 37.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 48.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 41.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 50.9% | -13.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 44.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 49.0% | -1.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 46.1% | -5.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 46.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 41.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 40.7% | -9.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 45.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 653.4% | 0.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 39.4% | 163.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 37.0% | 3.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 587.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 35.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 37.4% | 8.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 40.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.33 | $0.00 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.13 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.10 | $0.52 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.98 | $0.01 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.11 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.94 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.92 | $0.03 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.98 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $1.4B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $119.1M | $93.2M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.9B | $1.2B |
| Total Assets | $24.2B | $1.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.04× | 0.08× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $836.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $802.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $119.1M | $93.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $119.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $119.1M | $93.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $119.1M | $82.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $119.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $119.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $119.1M | $82.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $119.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.9B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.9B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.9B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.9B | $759.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.8B | $740.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.8B | — |
| Q4 25 | $24.2B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.7B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.2B | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $23.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $23.3B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.2B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $23.4B | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.04× | 0.08× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.04× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.04× | 0.08× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.04× | 0.11× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.04× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.04× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.04× | 0.11× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.04× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $368.6M | $8.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $363.7M | $3.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 163.2% | 1.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.2% | 1.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.07× | 4.21× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $672.7M | $-96.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $368.6M | $8.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $150.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $64.0M | $-72.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $99.0M | $40.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $329.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $81.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $72.9M | $-39.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $88.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $363.7M | $3.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $150.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.7M | $-82.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $96.3M | $32.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $325.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $80.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $72.4M | $-49.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $87.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | 163.2% | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 71.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.9% | -29.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 51.2% | 10.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 174.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 42.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 40.5% | -16.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 49.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.2% | 1.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.6% | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.4% | 2.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.3% | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.07× | 4.21× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.94× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.83× | -0.16× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.42× | 3.38× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.10× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.20× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.09× | -1.54× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.23× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
