vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP (CATY) and SENSIENT TECHNOLOGIES CORP (SXT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SENSIENT TECHNOLOGIES CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($435.8M vs $222.8M, roughly 2.0× CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP). CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP runs the higher net margin — 653.4% vs 10.1%, a 643.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (19.5% vs 11.1%). Over the past eight quarters, CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP's revenue compounded faster (12.8% CAGR vs 3.9%).
Cathay General Bancorp is a U.S.-headquartered bank holding company that operates Cathay Bank, offering full-spectrum commercial and personal banking services. It primarily serves Asian American communities and small-to-medium enterprises across major U.S. states including California, New York and Texas, as well as select Asian markets, with products covering deposits, loans, and wealth management solutions.
Sensient Technologies is a global manufacturer and marketer of colors, flavors and fragrances based in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Their products are used in many foods and beverages, pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, home and personal care products, specialty printing and imaging products, computer imaging and industrial colors. Sensient reported revenue of $1,468 million in 2013. Subdivisions include the Sensient Flavors & Fragrances Group and the Sensient Color Group. Within the Flavors & Fragrances G...
CATY vs SXT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $222.8M | $435.8M |
| Net Profit | $90.5M | $44.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 50.9% | 15.3% |
| Net Margin | 653.4% | 10.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 19.5% | 11.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 12.9% | 28.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.33 | $1.04 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $435.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $222.8M | $393.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $210.6M | $412.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $196.6M | $414.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $187.8M | $392.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $186.5M | $376.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $189.5M | $392.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $178.5M | $403.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $44.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $90.5M | $25.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $77.7M | $37.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $77.5M | $37.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $69.5M | $34.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $80.2M | $30.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $67.5M | $32.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $66.8M | $30.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 31.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 34.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 34.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 33.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 31.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 33.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 32.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | 15.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 50.9% | 9.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 44.5% | 14.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 49.0% | 13.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 46.1% | 13.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 46.5% | 11.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 41.2% | 12.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 40.7% | 12.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 10.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 653.4% | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.9% | 9.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 39.4% | 9.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 37.0% | 8.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 587.9% | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 35.6% | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 37.4% | 7.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.04 | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.33 | $0.60 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.13 | $0.87 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.10 | $0.88 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.98 | $0.81 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.11 | $0.71 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.94 | $0.77 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.92 | $0.73 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $38.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $119.1M | $767.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.9B | $1.2B |
| Total Assets | $24.2B | $2.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.04× | 0.63× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $38.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $36.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $42.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $56.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $32.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $26.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $37.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $30.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | $767.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $119.1M | $709.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $119.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $119.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $119.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $119.1M | $613.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $119.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $119.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.9B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.9B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.9B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.9B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.8B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.8B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.8B | $1.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $24.2B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.1B | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.7B | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.2B | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $23.1B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $23.3B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.2B | $2.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.63× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.04× | 0.59× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.04× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.04× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.04× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.04× | 0.58× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.04× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.04× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $368.6M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $363.7M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 163.2% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.2% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.07× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $672.7M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $368.6M | $44.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $150.6M | $44.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $64.0M | $48.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $99.0M | $-9.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $329.2M | $21.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $81.2M | $76.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $72.9M | $43.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $363.7M | $12.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $150.1M | $24.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.7M | $27.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $96.3M | $-25.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $325.5M | $-1.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $80.0M | $63.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $72.4M | $32.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 163.2% | 3.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 71.3% | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.9% | 6.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 51.2% | -6.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 174.6% | -0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 42.2% | 16.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 40.5% | 7.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.2% | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.2% | 4.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.6% | 5.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.4% | 4.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.9% | 6.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.6% | 3.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.3% | 2.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.07× | 1.75× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.94× | 1.19× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.83× | 1.28× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.42× | -0.26× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.10× | 0.71× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.20× | 2.35× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.09× | 1.42× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
