vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Commercial Bancgroup, Inc. (CBK) and EVOLUTION PETROLEUM CORP (EPM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Commercial Bancgroup, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($23.1M vs $20.7M, roughly 1.1× EVOLUTION PETROLEUM CORP). Commercial Bancgroup, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 41.3% vs 5.2%, a 36.2% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Commercial Bancgroup, Inc.CBKEarnings & Financial Report
Commercial Bancgroup, Inc. operates as a U.S. regional bank holding company that provides a full suite of retail and commercial banking products and services to individual consumers, small and medium-sized businesses, and local institutional clients. Its core offerings include deposit accounts, lending solutions, wealth management, and tailored financial advisory services for regional markets.
CBK vs EPM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $23.1M | $20.7M |
| Net Profit | $9.5M | $1.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 44.3% |
| Operating Margin | — | 3.2% |
| Net Margin | 41.3% | 5.2% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 2.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 9.7% | 158.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.69 | $0.03 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $23.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $23.5M | $20.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.8M | $21.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $21.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $22.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $20.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $21.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $21.2M |
| Q1 26 | $9.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.9M | $1.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.5M | $824.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-2.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-1.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 44.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 38.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 46.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 40.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 36.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 46.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 46.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 53.8% | -0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 6.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -3.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 8.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 11.3% |
| Q1 26 | 41.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 42.2% | 5.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 41.4% | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 16.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -9.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -9.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 9.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.8% |
| Q1 26 | $0.69 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.72 | $0.03 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.77 | $0.02 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.10 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.07 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.06 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.04 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $3.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $118.2M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $67.5M |
| Total Assets | $2.3B | $169.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $3.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $154.8M | $714.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $5.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $11.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $6.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.4M |
| Q1 26 | $118.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $166.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $100.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $67.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $245.2M | $69.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $71.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $71.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $76.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $79.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $81.1M |
| Q1 26 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | $169.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $169.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $160.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $156.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $160.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $157.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $162.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.41× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $5.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 5.09× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $5.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $28.0M | $7.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $10.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $7.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $7.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $8.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 115.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 5.09× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.96× | 9.47× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.06× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.69× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.47× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CBK
| Net Interest Income | $20.5M | 89% |
| Noninterest Income | $2.6M | 11% |
EPM
| Crude Oil | $10.7M | 52% |
| Natural Gas Reserves | $7.4M | 36% |
| Natural Gas Liquids Reserves | $2.5M | 12% |
