vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Commercial Bancgroup, Inc. (CBK) and FREQUENCY ELECTRONICS INC (FEIM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Commercial Bancgroup, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($23.1M vs $17.1M, roughly 1.3× FREQUENCY ELECTRONICS INC). Commercial Bancgroup, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 41.3% vs 10.5%, a 30.8% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Commercial Bancgroup, Inc.CBKEarnings & Financial Report
Commercial Bancgroup, Inc. operates as a U.S. regional bank holding company that provides a full suite of retail and commercial banking products and services to individual consumers, small and medium-sized businesses, and local institutional clients. Its core offerings include deposit accounts, lending solutions, wealth management, and tailored financial advisory services for regional markets.
Ultra Electronics Holdings is a British defence and security company. It was listed on the London Stock Exchange and was a constituent of the FTSE 250 Index until it was acquired by Cobham, which is itself owned by Advent International.
CBK vs FEIM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $23.1M | $17.1M |
| Net Profit | $9.5M | $1.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 38.2% |
| Operating Margin | — | 10.0% |
| Net Margin | 41.3% | 10.5% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 8.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 9.7% | -32.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.69 | $0.18 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $23.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $23.5M | $17.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.8M | $13.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $20.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $18.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $15.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $15.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $15.6M |
| Q1 26 | $9.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.9M | $1.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.5M | $634.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $15.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 38.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 36.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 37.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 43.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 48.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 44.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 40.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 10.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 53.8% | 2.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 16.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 18.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 16.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 15.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 16.0% |
| Q1 26 | 41.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 42.2% | 10.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 41.4% | 4.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 16.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 81.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 16.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 16.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 16.9% |
| Q1 26 | $0.69 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.72 | $0.18 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.77 | $0.07 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.33 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.60 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.28 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.25 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.28 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $3.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $118.2M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $58.5M |
| Total Assets | $2.3B | $92.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $3.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $154.8M | $4.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $5.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $9.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $16.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $18.3M |
| Q1 26 | $118.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $166.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $100.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $58.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $245.2M | $56.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $55.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $51.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $36.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $33.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $39.8M |
| Q1 26 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | $92.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $93.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $93.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $86.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $77.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $84.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $83.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.41× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-523.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-1.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -6.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 3.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -0.29× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-5.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-523.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $28.0M | $1.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-155.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-3.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-1.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $7.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-1.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.5M | $385.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-786.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-4.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-1.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -6.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 115.8% | 2.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -3.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -20.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 20.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -11.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 42.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.7% | 5.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -0.29× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.96× | 1.83× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.05× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -0.24× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.44× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -0.60× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.85× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CBK
| Net Interest Income | $20.5M | 89% |
| Noninterest Income | $2.6M | 11% |
FEIM
| POC Revenue | $14.8M | 86% |
| POT Revenue | $2.3M | 13% |
