vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Commercial Bancgroup, Inc. (CBK) and Good Times Restaurants Inc. (GTIM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Good Times Restaurants Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($32.7M vs $23.1M, roughly 1.4× Commercial Bancgroup, Inc.). Commercial Bancgroup, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 41.3% vs 0.6%, a 40.8% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Commercial Bancgroup, Inc.CBKEarnings & Financial Report
Commercial Bancgroup, Inc. operates as a U.S. regional bank holding company that provides a full suite of retail and commercial banking products and services to individual consumers, small and medium-sized businesses, and local institutional clients. Its core offerings include deposit accounts, lending solutions, wealth management, and tailored financial advisory services for regional markets.
Good Times is a Golden, Colorado–based fast-food restaurant specializing in premium burgers and frozen custard. As of July 2023, the chain operates 31 locations, down from 38 in 2015.
CBK vs GTIM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $23.1M | $32.7M |
| Net Profit | $9.5M | $181.0K |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | 0.9% |
| Net Margin | 41.3% | 0.6% |
| Revenue YoY | — | -10.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 9.7% | 10.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.69 | $0.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $23.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $23.5M | $32.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.8M | $37.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $34.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $36.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $35.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $38.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $35.4M |
| Q1 26 | $9.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.9M | $181.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.5M | $1.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-624.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $164.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $230.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $618.0K |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 53.8% | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -1.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -0.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.8% |
| Q1 26 | 41.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 42.2% | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 41.4% | 4.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -1.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.7% |
| Q1 26 | $0.69 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.72 | $0.02 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.77 | $0.14 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.06 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.02 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.01 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.12 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.06 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $118.2M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $33.2M |
| Total Assets | $2.3B | $82.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $154.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $4.0M |
| Q1 26 | $118.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $166.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $100.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $33.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $245.2M | $33.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $31.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $32.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $32.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $32.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $31.6M |
| Q1 26 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | $82.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $85.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $86.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $89.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $87.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $90.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $89.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.41× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $1.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $1.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 3.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 7.85× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-72.0K |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $28.0M | $1.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $714.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-518.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $394.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.5M | $735.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-105.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-1.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-466.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 115.8% | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -5.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -1.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.7% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 7.85× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.96× | 0.85× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -3.16× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.71× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.44× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.86× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CBK
| Net Interest Income | $20.5M | 89% |
| Noninterest Income | $2.6M | 11% |
GTIM
Segment breakdown not available.
