vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Ceribell, Inc. (CBLL) and UNITED SECURITY BANCSHARES (UBFO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Ceribell, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($24.8M vs $13.5M, roughly 1.8× UNITED SECURITY BANCSHARES). UNITED SECURITY BANCSHARES runs the higher net margin — 25.2% vs -54.6%, a 79.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. UNITED SECURITY BANCSHARES produced more free cash flow last quarter ($19.8M vs $-11.0M).
Ceribell, Inc. develops and commercializes innovative portable neurodiagnostic medical devices, focused on rapid non-invasive electroencephalogram (EEG) solutions for seizure detection. Its core products serve hospital emergency departments, intensive care units, and long-term care facilities, with primary markets across North America and ongoing global expansion efforts.
United Security Bancshares is a bank holding company headquartered in Fresno, California. It operates 11 branches.
CBLL vs UBFO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $24.8M | $13.5M |
| Net Profit | $-13.5M | $3.4M |
| Gross Margin | 87.3% | — |
| Operating Margin | -58.9% | 31.5% |
| Net Margin | -54.6% | 25.2% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 13.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 36.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.35 | $0.18 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $24.8M | $13.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.6M | $14.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.2M | $12.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.5M | $13.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $11.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.2M | $13.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $13.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $12.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-13.5M | $3.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-13.5M | $4.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-13.6M | $2.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-12.8M | $2.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-10.4M | $3.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $4.2M |
| Q4 25 | 87.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 88.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 88.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 87.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 87.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -58.9% | 31.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -64.8% | 40.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -70.5% | 24.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -69.3% | 27.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 27.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -57.8% | 37.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 46.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 45.9% |
| Q4 25 | -54.6% | 25.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -59.6% | 28.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -64.4% | 17.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -62.4% | 19.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 20.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -60.6% | 27.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 33.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 32.6% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.35 | $0.18 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.37 | $0.23 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.38 | $0.13 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.36 | $0.16 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.14 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.85 | $0.22 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.25 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.24 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $159.3M | $264.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $155.3M | $139.7M |
| Total Assets | $195.8M | $1.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $159.3M | $264.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $168.5M | $211.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $177.4M | $199.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $182.7M | $198.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $216.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.1M | $216.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $166.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $168.6M |
| Q4 25 | $155.3M | $139.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $164.1M | $137.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $172.2M | $134.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $180.9M | $132.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $130.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-136.0M | $132.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $127.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $124.2M |
| Q4 25 | $195.8M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $199.5M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $207.7M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $213.5M | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.1M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.2B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-10.8M | $22.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-11.0M | $19.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -44.2% | 146.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.7% | 16.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 6.46× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-41.6M | $36.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-10.8M | $22.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-11.1M | $7.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.5M | $8.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.4M | $3.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $19.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $5.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $7.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-11.0M | $19.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-11.5M | $6.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.6M | $8.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.6M | $2.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $18.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $5.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $7.0M |
| Q4 25 | -44.2% | 146.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -50.8% | 43.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -35.9% | 64.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -56.4% | 21.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 156.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 38.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 15.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 54.8% |
| Q4 25 | 0.7% | 16.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.6% | 6.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.3% | 4.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.7% | 0.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 6.46× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.73× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.01× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.13× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.87× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.40× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.54× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.79× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CBLL
| Products | $18.8M | 76% |
| Subscription | $6.0M | 24% |
UBFO
Segment breakdown not available.
