vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Chemours Co (CC) and EnerSys (ENS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Chemours Co is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.3B vs $919.1M, roughly 1.4× EnerSys). EnerSys runs the higher net margin — 9.8% vs -3.5%, a 13.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, EnerSys posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (1.4% vs -2.1%). EnerSys produced more free cash flow last quarter ($171.3M vs $92.0M). Over the past eight quarters, EnerSys's revenue compounded faster (0.5% CAGR vs -1.2%).
The Chemours Company is an American chemical company that was founded in July 2015 as a spin-off from DuPont. It has its corporate headquarters in Wilmington, Delaware, United States. Chemours is the manufacturer of Teflon, the brand name of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), known for its anti-stick properties. It also produces titanium dioxide and refrigerant gases.
EnerSys is a stored energy systems and technology provider for industrial applications. The company manufactures reserve-power and motive-power batteries, battery chargers, power equipment, battery accessories and outdoor equipment enclosures.
CC vs ENS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.3B | $919.1M |
| Net Profit | $-47.0M | $90.4M |
| Gross Margin | 11.7% | 30.1% |
| Operating Margin | — | 13.5% |
| Net Margin | -3.5% | 9.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.1% | 1.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -261.5% | -21.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.32 | $2.40 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $919.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $951.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $893.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $974.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $906.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $883.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $852.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $910.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-47.0M | $90.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $46.0M | $68.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-380.0M | $57.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.0M | $96.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-13.0M | $114.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-32.0M | $82.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $60.0M | $70.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $54.0M | $60.9M |
| Q4 25 | 11.7% | 30.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.6% | 29.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.2% | 28.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.3% | 31.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.4% | 32.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.0% | 28.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.8% | 27.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.9% | 27.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 13.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.5% | 9.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.4% | 9.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 13.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.1% | 15.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.4% | 10.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.1% | 8.9% |
| Q4 25 | -3.5% | 9.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.1% | 7.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -23.5% | 6.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.4% | 9.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.0% | 12.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | 9.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.9% | 8.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.0% | 6.7% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.32 | $2.40 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.31 | $1.80 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.53 | $1.46 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.03 | $2.39 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.07 | $2.88 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.22 | $2.01 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.39 | $1.71 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.36 | $1.48 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $670.0M | $450.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $4.1B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $250.0M | $1.9B |
| Total Assets | $7.4B | $4.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 16.40× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $670.0M | $450.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $613.0M | $388.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $502.0M | $346.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $464.0M | $343.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $713.0M | $463.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $596.0M | $407.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $604.0M | $344.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $746.0M | $333.3M |
| Q4 25 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.0B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.0B | $802.0M |
| Q4 25 | $250.0M | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $274.0M | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $228.0M | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $566.0M | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $571.0M | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $643.0M | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $714.0M | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $753.0M | $1.8B |
| Q4 25 | $7.4B | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.5B | $4.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.5B | $4.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.4B | $4.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5B | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.5B | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.2B | $3.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.0B | $3.5B |
| Q4 25 | 16.40× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.96× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.99× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.18× | 0.57× | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.11× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.20× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.53× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.27× | 0.46× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $137.0M | $184.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $92.0M | $171.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.9% | 18.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.4% | 1.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 2.04× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $51.0M | $441.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $137.0M | $184.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $146.0M | $218.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $93.0M | $968.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-112.0M | $135.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $138.0M | $81.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $139.0M | $33.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-620.0M | $10.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-290.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $92.0M | $171.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $105.0M | $197.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $50.0M | $-32.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-196.0M | $104.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.0M | $56.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $63.0M | $3.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-693.0M | $-25.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-392.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | 6.9% | 18.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.0% | 20.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.1% | -3.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -14.3% | 10.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.2% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -44.6% | -3.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -28.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 3.4% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.7% | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.7% | 3.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.1% | 3.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.0% | 2.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.0% | 3.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | 4.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.04× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.17× | 3.19× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.02× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.40× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.71× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 24 | -10.33× | 0.15× | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.37× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CC
| Titanium Technologies | $563.0M | 42% |
| Thermal And Specialized Solutions | $443.0M | 33% |
| Advanced Performance Materials | $312.0M | 23% |
| Other Non-Reportable Segment | $12.0M | 1% |
ENS
| Energy Systems | $399.5M | 43% |
| Motive Power | $352.0M | 38% |
| Services | $92.6M | 10% |
| Transferred Over Time | $38.2M | 4% |
| Other | $36.8M | 4% |
