vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Chemours Co (CC) and Fabrinet (FN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Chemours Co is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.3B vs $1.1B, roughly 1.2× Fabrinet). Fabrinet runs the higher net margin — 9.9% vs -3.5%, a 13.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Fabrinet posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (35.9% vs -2.1%). Chemours Co produced more free cash flow last quarter ($92.0M vs $-5.3M). Over the past eight quarters, Fabrinet's revenue compounded faster (24.4% CAGR vs -1.2%).
The Chemours Company is an American chemical company that was founded in July 2015 as a spin-off from DuPont. It has its corporate headquarters in Wilmington, Delaware, United States. Chemours is the manufacturer of Teflon, the brand name of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), known for its anti-stick properties. It also produces titanium dioxide and refrigerant gases.
FabrinetFNEarnings & Financial Report
Below is a list of companies having stocks that are included in the S&P MidCap 400 stock market index. The index, maintained by S&P Dow Jones Indices, comprises the common stocks of 400 mid-cap, mostly American, companies. Although called the S&P 400, the index sometimes contains more than 400 stocks when it includes two or more share classes of stock from one of its component companies.
CC vs FN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.3B | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $-47.0M | $112.6M |
| Gross Margin | 11.7% | 12.2% |
| Operating Margin | — | 10.1% |
| Net Margin | -3.5% | 9.9% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.1% | 35.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -261.5% | 30.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.32 | $3.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $978.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $909.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $871.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $833.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $804.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $753.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $731.5M |
| Q4 25 | $-47.0M | $112.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $46.0M | $95.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-380.0M | $87.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.0M | $81.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-13.0M | $86.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-32.0M | $77.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $60.0M | $81.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $54.0M | $80.9M |
| Q4 25 | 11.7% | 12.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.6% | 11.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.2% | 12.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.3% | 11.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.4% | 12.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.0% | 12.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.8% | 12.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.9% | 12.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 10.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.5% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.4% | 9.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 9.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.1% | 9.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.4% | 9.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.1% | 9.7% |
| Q4 25 | -3.5% | 9.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.1% | 9.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -23.5% | 9.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.4% | 9.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.0% | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.9% | 10.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.0% | 11.1% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.32 | $3.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.31 | $2.66 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.53 | $2.41 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.03 | $2.25 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.07 | $2.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.22 | $2.13 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.39 | $2.22 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.36 | $2.21 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $670.0M | $960.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $4.1B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $250.0M | $2.2B |
| Total Assets | $7.4B | $3.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 16.40× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $670.0M | $960.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $613.0M | $968.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $502.0M | $934.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $464.0M | $950.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $713.0M | $934.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $596.0M | $908.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $604.0M | $858.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $746.0M | $794.0M |
| Q4 25 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.0B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.0B | — |
| Q4 25 | $250.0M | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $274.0M | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $228.0M | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $566.0M | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $571.0M | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $643.0M | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $714.0M | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $753.0M | $1.7B |
| Q4 25 | $7.4B | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.5B | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.5B | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.4B | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.5B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.2B | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.0B | $2.2B |
| Q4 25 | 16.40× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.96× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.99× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.18× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.11× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.20× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.53× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.27× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $137.0M | $46.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $92.0M | $-5.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.9% | -0.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.4% | 4.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 0.41× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $51.0M | $102.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $137.0M | $46.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $146.0M | $102.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $93.0M | $55.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-112.0M | $74.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $138.0M | $115.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $139.0M | $83.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-620.0M | $83.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-290.0M | $100.9M |
| Q4 25 | $92.0M | $-5.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $105.0M | $57.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $50.0M | $4.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-196.0M | $45.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.0M | $94.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $63.0M | $62.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-693.0M | $70.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-392.0M | $87.3M |
| Q4 25 | 6.9% | -0.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.0% | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.1% | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -14.3% | 5.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | 11.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.2% | 7.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -44.6% | 9.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -28.8% | 11.9% |
| Q4 25 | 3.4% | 4.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.7% | 4.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.7% | 5.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.1% | 3.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.0% | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.0% | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.5% | 1.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.41× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.17× | 1.07× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.63× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.91× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.34× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.07× | ||
| Q2 24 | -10.33× | 1.02× | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.37× | 1.25× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CC
| Titanium Technologies | $563.0M | 42% |
| Thermal And Specialized Solutions | $443.0M | 33% |
| Advanced Performance Materials | $312.0M | 23% |
| Other Non-Reportable Segment | $12.0M | 1% |
FN
| Optical Communications | $832.6M | 73% |
| Non Optical Communications | $300.3M | 27% |
