vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Chemours Co (CC) and Gen Digital (GEN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Chemours Co is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.3B vs $1.2B, roughly 1.1× Gen Digital). Gen Digital runs the higher net margin — 15.5% vs -3.5%, a 19.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Gen Digital posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (28.5% vs -2.1%). Over the past eight quarters, Gen Digital's revenue compounded faster (13.2% CAGR vs -1.2%).
The Chemours Company is an American chemical company that was founded in July 2015 as a spin-off from DuPont. It has its corporate headquarters in Wilmington, Delaware, United States. Chemours is the manufacturer of Teflon, the brand name of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), known for its anti-stick properties. It also produces titanium dioxide and refrigerant gases.
Gen Digital Inc. is a multinational software company co-headquartered in both Tempe, Arizona (USA) and Prague, Czech Republic (EU). The company provides cybersecurity software, financial technology, and services. Gen is a Fortune 500 company and a member of the S&P 500 stock-market index. It is listed at both NASDAQ and Prague Stock Exchange. Its portfolio includes Norton, Avast, LifeLock, Avira, AVG, ReputationDefender, MoneyLion and CCleaner.
CC vs GEN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.3B | $1.2B |
| Net Profit | $-47.0M | $192.0M |
| Gross Margin | 11.7% | 78.4% |
| Operating Margin | — | 34.9% |
| Net Margin | -3.5% | 15.5% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.1% | 28.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -261.5% | 6.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.32 | $0.31 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $986.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $974.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $965.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $192.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-47.0M | $134.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $46.0M | $135.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-380.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.0M | $142.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-13.0M | $159.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-32.0M | $161.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $60.0M | $181.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 78.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.7% | 78.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.6% | 78.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.3% | 80.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.4% | 80.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.0% | 80.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.8% | 80.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 34.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 35.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.5% | 35.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 41.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.1% | 37.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | 41.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.4% | 43.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | 15.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | -3.5% | 11.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.1% | 10.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -23.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.4% | 14.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.0% | 16.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | 16.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.9% | 18.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.31 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.32 | $0.21 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.31 | $0.22 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.53 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.03 | $0.22 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.07 | $0.26 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.22 | $0.26 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.39 | $0.29 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $670.0M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $4.1B | $8.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $250.0M | $2.3B |
| Total Assets | $7.4B | $15.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 16.40× | 3.61× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $670.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $613.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $502.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $464.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $713.0M | $883.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $596.0M | $737.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $604.0M | $644.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $8.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.1B | $8.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1B | $8.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.1B | $8.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1B | $8.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0B | $8.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.0B | $8.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $250.0M | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $274.0M | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $228.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $566.0M | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $571.0M | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $643.0M | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $714.0M | $2.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | $15.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.4B | $16.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.5B | $16.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.5B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.4B | $15.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5B | $15.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.5B | $15.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.2B | $15.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.61× | ||
| Q4 25 | 16.40× | 3.54× | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.96× | 3.75× | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.99× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.18× | 3.64× | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.11× | 3.94× | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.20× | 4.06× | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.53× | 4.33× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $137.0M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $92.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.9% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.4% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $51.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $137.0M | $541.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $146.0M | $409.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $93.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-112.0M | $473.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $138.0M | $326.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $139.0M | $158.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-620.0M | $264.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $92.0M | $535.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $105.0M | $405.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $50.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-196.0M | $470.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.0M | $318.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $63.0M | $156.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-693.0M | $262.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.9% | 43.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.0% | 32.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -14.3% | 46.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | 32.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.2% | 16.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -44.6% | 27.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.4% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.7% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.1% | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.0% | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.0% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | 0.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 4.04× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.17× | 3.03× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.33× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.05× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.98× | ||
| Q2 24 | -10.33× | 1.46× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CC
| Titanium Technologies | $563.0M | 42% |
| Thermal And Specialized Solutions | $443.0M | 33% |
| Advanced Performance Materials | $312.0M | 23% |
| Other Non-Reportable Segment | $12.0M | 1% |
GEN
| Cyber Safety Platform | $819.0M | 66% |
| Trust Based Solutions | $421.0M | 34% |
| Net Interest Income On Notes Receivable | $4.0M | 0% |
