vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Chemours Co (CC) and MODINE MANUFACTURING CO (MOD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Chemours Co is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.3B vs $805.0M, roughly 1.7× MODINE MANUFACTURING CO). Chemours Co runs the higher net margin — -3.5% vs -5.9%, a 2.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, MODINE MANUFACTURING CO posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (30.5% vs -2.1%). Chemours Co produced more free cash flow last quarter ($92.0M vs $-17.1M). Over the past eight quarters, MODINE MANUFACTURING CO's revenue compounded faster (15.5% CAGR vs -1.2%).
The Chemours Company is an American chemical company that was founded in July 2015 as a spin-off from DuPont. It has its corporate headquarters in Wilmington, Delaware, United States. Chemours is the manufacturer of Teflon, the brand name of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), known for its anti-stick properties. It also produces titanium dioxide and refrigerant gases.
Modine Manufacturing is a thermal management company established in 1916 in the United States. The company started as Modine Manufacturing Company by Arthur B Modine who patented the Spirex radiator for tractors. The Modine company manufactured the Turbotube radiator for Ford Model T cars. The company built the world's first vehicular wind tunnel in Racine, Wisconsin in 1941. During WWII, Modine manufactured aftercoolers for the P-51 Mustang fighter plane. After WWII, Modine introduced the Ai...
CC vs MOD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.3B | $805.0M |
| Net Profit | $-47.0M | $-47.4M |
| Gross Margin | 11.7% | 23.1% |
| Operating Margin | — | 11.1% |
| Net Margin | -3.5% | -5.9% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.1% | 30.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -261.5% | -215.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.32 | $-0.90 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $805.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $738.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $682.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $647.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $616.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $658.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $661.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $603.5M |
| Q4 25 | $-47.0M | $-47.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $46.0M | $44.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-380.0M | $51.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.0M | $49.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-13.0M | $41.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-32.0M | $46.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $60.0M | $47.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $54.0M | $25.8M |
| Q4 25 | 11.7% | 23.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.6% | 22.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.2% | 24.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.3% | 25.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.4% | 24.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.0% | 25.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.8% | 24.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.9% | 22.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 11.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.5% | 9.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.4% | 11.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 11.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.1% | 9.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | 11.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.4% | 11.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.1% | 7.8% |
| Q4 25 | -3.5% | -5.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.1% | 6.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -23.5% | 7.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.4% | 7.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.0% | 6.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | 7.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.9% | 7.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.0% | 4.3% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.32 | $-0.90 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.31 | $0.83 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.53 | $0.95 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.03 | $0.92 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.07 | $0.76 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.22 | $0.86 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.39 | $0.88 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.36 | $0.48 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $670.0M | $98.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $4.1B | $570.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $250.0M | $1.1B |
| Total Assets | $7.4B | $2.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 16.40× | 0.51× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $670.0M | $98.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $613.0M | $83.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $502.0M | $124.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $464.0M | $71.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $713.0M | $83.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $596.0M | $78.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $604.0M | $72.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $746.0M | $60.1M |
| Q4 25 | $4.1B | $570.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1B | $525.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1B | $482.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.1B | $296.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1B | $330.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0B | $359.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.0B | $405.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.0B | $399.9M |
| Q4 25 | $250.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $274.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $228.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $566.0M | $910.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $571.0M | $855.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $643.0M | $858.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $714.0M | $788.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $753.0M | $747.6M |
| Q4 25 | $7.4B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.5B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.5B | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.4B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.5B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.2B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.0B | $1.9B |
| Q4 25 | 16.40× | 0.51× | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.96× | 0.50× | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.99× | 0.48× | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.18× | 0.33× | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.11× | 0.39× | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.20× | 0.42× | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.53× | 0.51× | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.27× | 0.53× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $137.0M | $24.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $92.0M | $-17.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.9% | -2.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.4% | 5.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $51.0M | $-20.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $137.0M | $24.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $146.0M | $1.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $93.0M | $27.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-112.0M | $54.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $138.0M | $60.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $139.0M | $57.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-620.0M | $40.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-290.0M | $39.6M |
| Q4 25 | $92.0M | $-17.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $105.0M | $-30.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $50.0M | $200.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-196.0M | $27.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.0M | $44.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $63.0M | $43.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-693.0M | $13.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-392.0M | $-4.3M |
| Q4 25 | 6.9% | -2.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.0% | -4.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.1% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -14.3% | 4.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | 7.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.2% | 6.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -44.6% | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -28.8% | -0.7% |
| Q4 25 | 3.4% | 5.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.7% | 4.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.7% | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.1% | 4.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.0% | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.0% | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | 4.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.5% | 7.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.17× | 0.03× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.54× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.10× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.48× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.24× | ||
| Q2 24 | -10.33× | 0.86× | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.37× | 1.53× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CC
| Titanium Technologies | $563.0M | 42% |
| Thermal And Specialized Solutions | $443.0M | 33% |
| Advanced Performance Materials | $312.0M | 23% |
| Other Non-Reportable Segment | $12.0M | 1% |
MOD
| Data Centers | $296.9M | 37% |
| Performance Technologies | $266.0M | 33% |
| Hvac Technologies | $107.1M | 13% |
| Air Cooled | $92.4M | 11% |
| Lb White | $25.6M | 3% |
| Climate By Design | $10.2M | 1% |
| Absolutaire | $7.0M | 1% |
