vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CIRRUS LOGIC, INC. (CRUS) and MODINE MANUFACTURING CO (MOD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MODINE MANUFACTURING CO is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($805.0M vs $580.6M, roughly 1.4× CIRRUS LOGIC, INC.). CIRRUS LOGIC, INC. runs the higher net margin — 24.2% vs -5.9%, a 30.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, MODINE MANUFACTURING CO posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (30.5% vs 4.5%). CIRRUS LOGIC, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($285.7M vs $-17.1M). Over the past eight quarters, CIRRUS LOGIC, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (25.0% CAGR vs 15.5%).
Cirrus Logic Inc. is an American fabless semiconductor supplier that specializes in analog, mixed-signal, and audio DSP integrated circuits (ICs). Since 1998, the company's headquarters have been in Austin, Texas.
Modine Manufacturing is a thermal management company established in 1916 in the United States. The company started as Modine Manufacturing Company by Arthur B Modine who patented the Spirex radiator for tractors. The Modine company manufactured the Turbotube radiator for Ford Model T cars. The company built the world's first vehicular wind tunnel in Racine, Wisconsin in 1941. During WWII, Modine manufactured aftercoolers for the P-51 Mustang fighter plane. After WWII, Modine introduced the Ai...
CRUS vs MOD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $580.6M | $805.0M |
| Net Profit | $140.3M | $-47.4M |
| Gross Margin | 53.1% | 23.1% |
| Operating Margin | 26.3% | 11.1% |
| Net Margin | 24.2% | -5.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.5% | 30.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 21.0% | -215.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.66 | $-0.90 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $580.6M | $805.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $561.0M | $738.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $407.3M | $682.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $424.5M | $647.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $555.7M | $616.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $541.9M | $658.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $374.0M | $661.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $371.8M | $603.5M |
| Q4 25 | $140.3M | $-47.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $131.6M | $44.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $60.7M | $51.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $71.3M | $49.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $116.0M | $41.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $102.1M | $46.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $42.1M | $47.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $44.8M | $25.8M |
| Q4 25 | 53.1% | 23.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 52.5% | 22.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 52.6% | 24.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 53.4% | 25.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 53.6% | 24.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 52.2% | 25.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 50.5% | 24.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 51.8% | 22.4% |
| Q4 25 | 26.3% | 11.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.8% | 9.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.8% | 11.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.2% | 11.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.2% | 9.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.3% | 11.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.5% | 11.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 14.1% | 7.8% |
| Q4 25 | 24.2% | -5.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.5% | 6.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.9% | 7.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.8% | 7.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.9% | 6.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.8% | 7.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.3% | 7.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.1% | 4.3% |
| Q4 25 | $2.66 | $-0.90 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.48 | $0.83 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.14 | $0.95 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.30 | $0.92 | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.11 | $0.76 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.83 | $0.86 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.76 | $0.88 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.78 | $0.48 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $778.1M | $98.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $570.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.1B | $1.1B |
| Total Assets | $2.5B | $2.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.51× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $778.1M | $98.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $593.5M | $83.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $548.9M | $124.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $539.6M | $71.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $526.4M | $83.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $445.8M | $78.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $491.4M | $72.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $502.8M | $60.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $570.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $525.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $482.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $296.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $330.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $359.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $405.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $399.9M |
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $910.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $855.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9B | $858.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $788.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | $747.6M |
| Q4 25 | $2.5B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3B | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2B | $1.9B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.51× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.50× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.48× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.33× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.39× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.42× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.51× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.53× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $290.8M | $24.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $285.7M | $-17.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 49.2% | -2.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.9% | 5.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.07× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $614.5M | $-20.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $290.8M | $24.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $92.2M | $1.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $116.1M | $27.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $130.4M | $54.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $218.6M | $60.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.2M | $57.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $87.2M | $40.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $170.5M | $39.6M |
| Q4 25 | $285.7M | $-17.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $88.3M | $-30.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $113.5M | $200.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $127.0M | $27.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $211.9M | $44.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.6M | $43.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $77.2M | $13.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $163.5M | $-4.3M |
| Q4 25 | 49.2% | -2.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.7% | -4.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 27.9% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.9% | 4.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.1% | 7.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.0% | 6.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.6% | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 44.0% | -0.7% |
| Q4 25 | 0.9% | 5.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.7% | 4.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.6% | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.8% | 4.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.2% | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.5% | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.7% | 4.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.9% | 7.3% |
| Q4 25 | 2.07× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.70× | 0.03× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.91× | 0.54× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.83× | 1.10× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.88× | 1.48× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.08× | 1.24× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.07× | 0.86× | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.80× | 1.53× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CRUS
| Audio Products Segment | $344.5M | 59% |
| High Performance Mixed Signal Products | $236.2M | 41% |
MOD
| Data Centers | $296.9M | 37% |
| Performance Technologies | $266.0M | 33% |
| Hvac Technologies | $107.1M | 13% |
| Air Cooled | $92.4M | 11% |
| Lb White | $25.6M | 3% |
| Climate By Design | $10.2M | 1% |
| Absolutaire | $7.0M | 1% |
