vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Chemours Co (CC) and Public Storage (PSA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Chemours Co is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.3B vs $1.2B, roughly 1.1× Public Storage). Public Storage runs the higher net margin — 41.7% vs -3.5%, a 45.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Public Storage posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (3.3% vs -2.1%). Over the past eight quarters, Public Storage's revenue compounded faster (2.5% CAGR vs -1.2%).
The Chemours Company is an American chemical company that was founded in July 2015 as a spin-off from DuPont. It has its corporate headquarters in Wilmington, Delaware, United States. Chemours is the manufacturer of Teflon, the brand name of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), known for its anti-stick properties. It also produces titanium dioxide and refrigerant gases.
Public Storage, headquartered in Glendale, California, is a real estate investment trust that invests in self storage. It is the largest brand of self-storage services in the US and owns approximately 9% of the self storage square footage in the U.S. As of December 31, 2024, the company operated 3,073 self-storage facilities containing an aggregate of 221 million net rentable square feet of space.
CC vs PSA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.3B | $1.2B |
| Net Profit | $-47.0M | $507.1M |
| Gross Margin | 11.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | — | 40.7% |
| Net Margin | -3.5% | 41.7% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.1% | 3.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -261.5% | -17.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.32 | $2.59 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | $-47.0M | $507.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $46.0M | $511.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-380.0M | $358.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.0M | $407.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-13.0M | $614.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-32.0M | $430.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $60.0M | $518.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $54.0M | $508.9M |
| Q4 25 | 11.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 40.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.5% | 42.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.4% | 30.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 34.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.1% | 52.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | 36.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.4% | 44.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.1% | 44.3% |
| Q4 25 | -3.5% | 41.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.1% | 41.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -23.5% | 29.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.4% | 34.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.0% | 52.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | 36.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.9% | 44.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.0% | 44.0% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.32 | $2.59 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.31 | $2.62 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.53 | $1.76 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.03 | $2.04 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.07 | $3.22 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.22 | $2.16 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.39 | $2.66 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.36 | $2.60 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $670.0M | $318.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $4.1B | $10.3B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $250.0M | $9.2B |
| Total Assets | $7.4B | $20.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 16.40× | 1.11× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $670.0M | $318.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $613.0M | $296.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $502.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $464.0M | $287.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $713.0M | $447.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $596.0M | $599.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $604.0M | $542.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $746.0M | $271.6M |
| Q4 25 | $4.1B | $10.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1B | $10.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1B | $10.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.1B | $9.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1B | $9.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0B | $9.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.0B | $9.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.0B | $9.1B |
| Q4 25 | $250.0M | $9.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $274.0M | $9.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $228.0M | $9.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $566.0M | $9.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $571.0M | $9.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $643.0M | $9.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $714.0M | $9.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $753.0M | $9.9B |
| Q4 25 | $7.4B | $20.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.5B | $20.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.5B | $20.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.4B | $19.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5B | $19.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.5B | $19.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.2B | $19.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.0B | $19.6B |
| Q4 25 | 16.40× | 1.11× | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.96× | 1.08× | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.99× | 1.11× | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.18× | 0.99× | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.11× | 0.96× | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.20× | 0.99× | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.53× | 0.97× | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.27× | 0.91× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $137.0M | $733.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $92.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.9% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.4% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.45× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $51.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $137.0M | $733.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $146.0M | $875.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $93.0M | $872.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-112.0M | $705.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $138.0M | $768.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $139.0M | $798.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-620.0M | $895.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-290.0M | $665.6M |
| Q4 25 | $92.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $105.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $50.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-196.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $63.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-693.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-392.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | 6.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -14.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -44.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -28.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 3.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.45× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.17× | 1.71× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.43× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.73× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.25× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.86× | ||
| Q2 24 | -10.33× | 1.73× | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.37× | 1.31× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CC
| Titanium Technologies | $563.0M | 42% |
| Thermal And Specialized Solutions | $443.0M | 33% |
| Advanced Performance Materials | $312.0M | 23% |
| Other Non-Reportable Segment | $12.0M | 1% |
PSA
| Self Storage Operations | $1.1B | 93% |
| Ancillary Operations | $86.9M | 7% |