vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Chemours Co (CC) and SS&C Technologies Holdings Inc (SSNC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SS&C Technologies Holdings Inc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.6B vs $1.3B, roughly 1.2× Chemours Co). SS&C Technologies Holdings Inc runs the higher net margin — 13.7% vs -3.5%, a 17.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SS&C Technologies Holdings Inc posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.8% vs -2.1%). Over the past eight quarters, SS&C Technologies Holdings Inc's revenue compounded faster (6.5% CAGR vs -1.2%).
The Chemours Company is an American chemical company that was founded in July 2015 as a spin-off from DuPont. It has its corporate headquarters in Wilmington, Delaware, United States. Chemours is the manufacturer of Teflon, the brand name of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), known for its anti-stick properties. It also produces titanium dioxide and refrigerant gases.
SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc. is an American multinational holding company headquartered in Windsor, Connecticut, that sells software and software as a service to the financial services industry. The company has offices in the Americas, Europe, Asia, Africa and Australia.
CC vs SSNC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.3B | $1.6B |
| Net Profit | $-47.0M | $226.1M |
| Gross Margin | 11.7% | 48.7% |
| Operating Margin | — | 24.2% |
| Net Margin | -3.5% | 13.7% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.1% | 8.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | -261.5% | 6.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.32 | $0.91 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | $226.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-47.0M | $193.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $46.0M | $210.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-380.0M | $180.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.0M | $213.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-13.0M | $248.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-32.0M | $164.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $60.0M | $190.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | 48.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.7% | 47.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.6% | 47.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.2% | 48.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.3% | 49.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.4% | 49.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.0% | 48.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.8% | 48.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 24.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 22.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.5% | 23.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.4% | 22.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 23.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.1% | 23.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | 22.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.4% | 22.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 13.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | -3.5% | 11.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.1% | 13.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -23.5% | 11.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.4% | 14.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.0% | 16.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.9% | 13.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.91 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.32 | $0.76 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.31 | $0.83 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.53 | $0.72 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.03 | $0.84 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.07 | $0.98 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.22 | $0.65 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.39 | $0.75 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $670.0M | $420.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $4.1B | $7.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $250.0M | $6.9B |
| Total Assets | $7.4B | $20.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 16.40× | 1.08× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $420.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $670.0M | $462.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $613.0M | $388.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $502.0M | $480.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $464.0M | $515.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $713.0M | $567.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $596.0M | $694.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $604.0M | $462.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | $7.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.0B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $6.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $250.0M | $6.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $274.0M | $6.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $228.0M | $6.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $566.0M | $6.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $571.0M | $6.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $643.0M | $6.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $714.0M | $6.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | $20.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.4B | $20.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.5B | $19.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.5B | $19.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.4B | $20.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5B | $19.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.5B | $18.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.2B | $16.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.08× | ||
| Q4 25 | 16.40× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.96× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.99× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.18× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.11× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.20× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.53× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $137.0M | $299.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $92.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.9% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.4% | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.33× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $51.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $299.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $137.0M | $643.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $146.0M | $456.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $93.0M | $372.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-112.0M | $272.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $138.0M | $486.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $139.0M | $336.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-620.0M | $384.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $92.0M | $633.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $105.0M | $421.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $50.0M | $350.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-196.0M | $259.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.0M | $466.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $63.0M | $310.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-693.0M | $374.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.9% | 38.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.0% | 26.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.1% | 22.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -14.3% | 17.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | 30.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.2% | 21.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -44.6% | 25.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.4% | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.7% | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.7% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.1% | 0.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.0% | 1.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.0% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | 0.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.33× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.33× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.17× | 2.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.06× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.28× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.96× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.05× | ||
| Q2 24 | -10.33× | 2.02× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CC
| Titanium Technologies | $563.0M | 42% |
| Thermal And Specialized Solutions | $443.0M | 33% |
| Advanced Performance Materials | $312.0M | 23% |
| Other Non-Reportable Segment | $12.0M | 1% |
SSNC
| Technology-enabled services | $1.4B | 85% |
| License, maintenance and related | $239.8M | 15% |