vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Chemours Co (CC) and Teradyne (TER). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Chemours Co is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.3B vs $1.3B, roughly 1.0× Teradyne). Teradyne runs the higher net margin — 31.1% vs -3.5%, a 34.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Teradyne posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (87.0% vs -2.1%). Over the past eight quarters, Teradyne's revenue compounded faster (32.6% CAGR vs -1.2%).
The Chemours Company is an American chemical company that was founded in July 2015 as a spin-off from DuPont. It has its corporate headquarters in Wilmington, Delaware, United States. Chemours is the manufacturer of Teflon, the brand name of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), known for its anti-stick properties. It also produces titanium dioxide and refrigerant gases.
Teradyne, Inc. is an American automatic test equipment (ATE) designer and manufacturer based in North Reading, Massachusetts. Its high-profile customers include Samsung, Qualcomm, Intel, Analog Devices, Texas Instruments and IBM.
CC vs TER — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.3B | $1.3B |
| Net Profit | $-47.0M | $398.9M |
| Gross Margin | 11.7% | 60.9% |
| Operating Margin | — | 36.9% |
| Net Margin | -3.5% | 31.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.1% | 87.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -261.5% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.32 | $2.53 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $769.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $651.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $685.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $752.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $737.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $729.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $398.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-47.0M | $257.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $46.0M | $119.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-380.0M | $78.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.0M | $98.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-13.0M | $146.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-32.0M | $145.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $60.0M | $186.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | 60.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.7% | 57.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.6% | 58.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.2% | 57.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.3% | 60.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.4% | 59.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.0% | 59.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.8% | 58.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 36.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 27.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.5% | 18.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.4% | 13.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 17.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.1% | 20.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | 20.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.4% | 28.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 31.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | -3.5% | 23.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.1% | 15.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -23.5% | 12.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.4% | 14.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.0% | 19.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | 19.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.9% | 25.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.53 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.32 | $1.62 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.31 | $0.75 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.53 | $0.49 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.03 | $0.61 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.07 | $0.89 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.22 | $0.89 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.39 | $1.14 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $670.0M | $241.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $4.1B | $0 |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $250.0M | — |
| Total Assets | $7.4B | $4.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 16.40× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $241.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $670.0M | $293.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $613.0M | $272.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $502.0M | $339.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $464.0M | $475.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $713.0M | $553.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $596.0M | $510.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $604.0M | $421.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $0 | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.0B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $250.0M | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $274.0M | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $228.0M | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $566.0M | $2.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $571.0M | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $643.0M | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $714.0M | $2.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.4B | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.5B | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.5B | $3.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.4B | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5B | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.5B | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.2B | $3.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 16.40× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.96× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.99× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.18× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.11× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.20× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.53× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $137.0M | $265.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $92.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.9% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.4% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 0.66× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $51.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $265.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $137.0M | $281.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $146.0M | $49.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $93.0M | $182.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-112.0M | $161.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $138.0M | $282.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $139.0M | $166.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-620.0M | $216.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $92.0M | $218.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $105.0M | $2.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $50.0M | $131.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-196.0M | $97.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.0M | $225.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $63.0M | $114.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-693.0M | $171.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.9% | 20.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.0% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.1% | 20.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -14.3% | 14.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | 29.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.2% | 15.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -44.6% | 23.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.4% | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.7% | 6.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.7% | 7.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.1% | 9.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.0% | 7.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.0% | 7.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | 6.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.66× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.09× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.17× | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.32× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.63× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.93× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.14× | ||
| Q2 24 | -10.33× | 1.16× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CC
| Titanium Technologies | $563.0M | 42% |
| Thermal And Specialized Solutions | $443.0M | 33% |
| Advanced Performance Materials | $312.0M | 23% |
| Other Non-Reportable Segment | $12.0M | 1% |
TER
Segment breakdown not available.
