vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CAPITAL CITY BANK GROUP INC (CCBG) and Ranpak Holdings Corp. (PACK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Ranpak Holdings Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($93.7M vs $63.5M, roughly 1.5× CAPITAL CITY BANK GROUP INC). On growth, CAPITAL CITY BANK GROUP INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.0% vs 2.3%). Over the past eight quarters, Ranpak Holdings Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (13.7% CAGR vs 6.0%).
Texas Capital Bank is a bank headquartered in Dallas, Texas. The bank has branches located in every major city in Texas. Its parent bank holding company is Texas Capital Bancshares. It also operates an online-only banking division, Bask Bank.
Ranpak Holdings Corp. manufactures machines and paper products used in protective paper-based packing for shipping goods and merchandise for e-commerce and industry, along with automation solutions. The company is based in Concord, Ohio, and has production facilities and offices in Reno, Nevada; Kansas City, Missouri; the Netherlands; Czech Republic; Shanghai and Singapore. The paper packaging material can be used for multiple applications like wrapping, cushioning, void fill and cold chain p...
CCBG vs PACK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $63.5M | $93.7M |
| Net Profit | $13.7M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | 39.0% |
| Operating Margin | 29.3% | -1.0% |
| Net Margin | 21.6% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 6.0% | 2.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 4.7% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.80 | $-0.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $63.5M | $93.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $65.9M | $83.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $63.2M | $77.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $61.5M | $77.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $59.9M | $91.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $59.7M | $78.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.9M | $72.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $56.5M | $72.5M |
| Q4 25 | $13.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.9M | $-10.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.0M | $-7.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.9M | $-10.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.1M | $-8.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.2M | $5.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.6M | $-8.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 39.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 41.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 37.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 39.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 45.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 43.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 43.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 44.6% |
| Q4 25 | 29.3% | -1.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.0% | -6.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.7% | -12.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 35.8% | -10.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.0% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.1% | -5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 29.3% | -7.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 27.2% | -6.6% |
| Q4 25 | 21.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.2% | -12.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.8% | -9.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.4% | -14.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.0% | -10.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.0% | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.2% | -11.2% |
| Q4 25 | $0.80 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.93 | $-0.12 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.88 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.99 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.78 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.77 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.83 | $0.07 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.74 | $-0.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $63.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $401.9M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $552.9M | $534.9M |
| Total Assets | $4.4B | $1.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.75× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $63.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $49.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $49.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $65.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $76.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $69.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $65.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $55.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $401.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $403.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $403.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $405.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $406.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $403.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $396.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $396.7M |
| Q4 25 | $552.9M | $534.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $540.6M | $537.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $526.4M | $539.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $512.6M | $544.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $495.3M | $548.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $476.5M | $564.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $461.0M | $566.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $448.3M | $560.0M |
| Q4 25 | $4.4B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.3B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.4B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.5B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.3B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.3B | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.75× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.75× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.75× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.74× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.74× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.71× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.70× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.71× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $87.6M | $19.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $80.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 126.1% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 12.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 6.39× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $150.1M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $87.6M | $19.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $21.6M | $8.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.6M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.9M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $63.6M | $6.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.8M | $10.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.9M | $19.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $14.6M | $5.2M |
| Q4 25 | $80.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $30.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $54.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | 126.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 30.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 48.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 31.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 91.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 12.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 6.39× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.35× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.17× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.30× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.86× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.97× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.76× | 3.56× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.17× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CCBG
Segment breakdown not available.
PACK
| Other | $47.9M | 51% |
| Europe And Asia Segment | $45.8M | 49% |
