vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CRYO CELL INTERNATIONAL INC (CCEL) and Navitas Semiconductor Corp (NVTS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Navitas Semiconductor Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($8.6M vs $7.8M, roughly 1.1× CRYO CELL INTERNATIONAL INC). On growth, CRYO CELL INTERNATIONAL INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-2.3% vs -38.7%). Over the past eight quarters, CRYO CELL INTERNATIONAL INC's revenue compounded faster (-0.1% CAGR vs -35.2%).
Cryo-Cell International, Inc. is a cord blood bank. It was founded by Dan Richard in 1989. Cryo-Cell International is the first private cord blood bank to separate and store stem cells. Cryo-Cell is headquartered outside of Tampa, in Oldsmar, Florida. In January 1997, the Company's stock began trading on the NASDAQ Small Cap market under symbol CCEL.
Navitas Semiconductor Corp is a leading global semiconductor firm specializing in gallium nitride (GaN) power integrated circuits. Its high-efficiency, compact power solutions serve consumer electronics, electric vehicles, renewable energy, and industrial sectors, with clients spanning North America, Asia, and Europe.
CCEL vs NVTS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $7.8M | $8.6M |
| Net Profit | $-3.8M | — |
| Gross Margin | 77.9% | 98.6% |
| Operating Margin | -50.6% | -260.6% |
| Net Margin | -48.7% | — |
| Revenue YoY | -2.3% | -38.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -105.1% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.46 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $8.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.8M | $7.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.8M | $10.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.9M | $14.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.0M | $14.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.0M | $18.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.1M | $21.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.0M | $20.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-3.8M | $-31.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $749.4K | $-19.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $355.8K | $-49.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $282.9K | $-16.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.9M | $-39.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1M | $-18.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $655.8K | $-22.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | 98.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 77.9% | 38.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 77.0% | 37.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 76.6% | 16.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 75.1% | 37.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 78.4% | 12.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 73.6% | 39.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 74.8% | 39.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | -260.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | -50.6% | -567.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.3% | -192.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.8% | -149.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.3% | -180.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.5% | -216.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.2% | -133.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.3% | -152.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -48.7% | -436.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.6% | -190.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.5% | -338.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.5% | -120.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -23.2% | -221.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.0% | -86.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.2% | -109.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.46 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.09 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.04 | $-0.25 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.03 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.23 | $-0.22 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.13 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.08 | $-0.12 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $3.3M | $221.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $8.4M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-18.6M | $420.0M |
| Total Assets | $61.7M | $481.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $221.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.3M | $236.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2M | $150.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.4M | $161.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5M | $75.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5M | $86.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1M | $98.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5M | $111.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.5M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $420.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-18.6M | $443.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-14.8M | $371.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-15.6M | $388.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-14.7M | $341.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-13.2M | $348.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.6M | $380.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-10.7M | $388.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $481.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $61.7M | $500.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $63.2M | $430.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $64.4M | $449.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.4M | $370.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $64.7M | $390.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $62.9M | $419.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $62.6M | $439.1M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.3M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $1.2M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 15.5% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.9% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $5.2M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.3M | $-8.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.5M | $-10.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $707.0K | $-11.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $954.1K | $-13.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2M | $-10.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4M | $-13.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8M | $-15.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2M | $-8.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.5M | $-10.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $644.6K | $-11.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $892.0K | $-13.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1M | $-10.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.3M | $-14.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.5K | $-17.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.5% | -111.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 31.9% | -106.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.1% | -82.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.2% | -96.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.8% | -59.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.9% | -65.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.3% | -87.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.9% | 0.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.5% | 7.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | 4.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.8% | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.1% | 3.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.3% | 2.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.8% | 13.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.38× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.99× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.37× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.32× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.70× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
