vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CRYO CELL INTERNATIONAL INC (CCEL) and PURE CYCLE CORP (PCYO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PURE CYCLE CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($9.1M vs $7.8M, roughly 1.2× CRYO CELL INTERNATIONAL INC). PURE CYCLE CORP runs the higher net margin — 50.0% vs -48.7%, a 98.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, PURE CYCLE CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (58.8% vs -2.3%). Over the past eight quarters, PURE CYCLE CORP's revenue compounded faster (69.0% CAGR vs -0.1%).
Cryo-Cell International, Inc. is a cord blood bank. It was founded by Dan Richard in 1989. Cryo-Cell International is the first private cord blood bank to separate and store stem cells. Cryo-Cell is headquartered outside of Tampa, in Oldsmar, Florida. In January 1997, the Company's stock began trading on the NASDAQ Small Cap market under symbol CCEL.
Pure Cycles, is a bicycle company based in Los Angeles, California that was founded by Michael Fishman, Jordan Schau, Zachary Schau and Austin Stoffers in 2010, as Pure Fix Cycles.
CCEL vs PCYO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $7.8M | $9.1M |
| Net Profit | $-3.8M | $4.6M |
| Gross Margin | 77.9% | 68.4% |
| Operating Margin | -50.6% | 48.0% |
| Net Margin | -48.7% | 50.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.3% | 58.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | -105.1% | 16.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.46 | $0.19 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $7.8M | $9.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.8M | $11.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.9M | $5.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.0M | $4.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.0M | $5.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.1M | $12.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.0M | $7.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.9M | $3.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-3.8M | $4.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $749.4K | $6.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $355.8K | $2.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $282.9K | $809.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.9M | $3.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1M | $6.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $655.8K | $2.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $556.2K | $118.0K |
| Q4 25 | 77.9% | 68.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 77.0% | 67.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 76.6% | 63.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 75.1% | 38.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 78.4% | 63.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 73.6% | 77.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 74.8% | 64.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 73.7% | 55.6% |
| Q4 25 | -50.6% | 48.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.3% | 53.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.8% | 26.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.3% | -33.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.5% | 29.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.2% | 62.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.3% | 40.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.5% | -11.5% |
| Q4 25 | -48.7% | 50.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.6% | 54.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.5% | 43.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.5% | 20.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -23.2% | 68.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.0% | 52.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.2% | 37.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.1% | 3.7% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.46 | $0.19 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.09 | $0.26 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.04 | $0.09 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.03 | $0.03 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.23 | $0.16 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.13 | $0.27 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.08 | $0.12 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.07 | $0.00 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $3.3M | $17.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $8.4M | $8.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-18.6M | $147.5M |
| Total Assets | $61.7M | $168.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.05× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.3M | $17.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2M | $21.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.4M | $14.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5M | $16.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5M | $19.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1M | $22.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5M | $20.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $979.6K | $20.6M |
| Q4 25 | $8.4M | $8.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.4M | $6.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.4M | $6.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.5M | $6.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.5M | $6.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.5M | $6.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-18.6M | $147.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-14.8M | $142.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-15.6M | $136.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-14.7M | $134.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-13.2M | $133.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.6M | $129.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-10.7M | $123.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-10.3M | $120.4M |
| Q4 25 | $61.7M | $168.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $63.2M | $162.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $64.4M | $151.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.4M | $149.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $64.7M | $149.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $62.9M | $147.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $62.6M | $140.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $61.7M | $135.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.05× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.05× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.05× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.05× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.05× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.05× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.3M | $-979.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $1.2M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 15.5% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.9% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -0.21× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $5.2M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.3M | $-979.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.5M | $9.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $707.0K | $-503.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $954.1K | $-1.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2M | $5.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4M | $3.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8M | $892.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-356.9K | $-457.0K |
| Q4 25 | $1.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $644.6K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $892.0K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.5K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-814.6K | — |
| Q4 25 | 15.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 31.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -10.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -0.21× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.38× | 1.53× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.99× | -0.22× | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.37× | -1.70× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.44× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.32× | 0.47× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.70× | 0.32× | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.64× | -3.87× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CCEL
Segment breakdown not available.
PCYO
| Construction | $6.5M | 71% |
| Water And Wastewater Resource Development Segment | $2.5M | 27% |
