vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CROSS COUNTRY HEALTHCARE INC (CCRN) and LendingClub Corp (LC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
LendingClub Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($252.3M vs $236.8M, roughly 1.1× CROSS COUNTRY HEALTHCARE INC). LendingClub Corp runs the higher net margin — 20.5% vs -35.0%, a 55.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, LendingClub Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.9% vs -23.6%). Over the past eight quarters, LendingClub Corp's revenue compounded faster (16.1% CAGR vs -21.0%).
GE Healthcare Technologies, Inc. is an American health technology company based in Chicago, Illinois. The company, which stylizes its own name as GE HealthCare, operates four divisions: Medical imaging, which includes molecular imaging, computed tomography, magnetic resonance, women’s health screening and X-ray systems; Ultrasound; Patient Care Solutions, which is focused on remote patient monitoring, anesthesia and respiratory care, diagnostic cardiology, and infant care; and Pharmaceutical ...
LendingClub Corporation is an American financial services company headquartered in San Francisco, California. It was the first peer-to-peer lender to register its offerings as securities with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), and to offer loan trading on a secondary market. At its height, LendingClub was the world's largest peer-to-peer lending platform. The company reported that $15.98 billion in loans had been originated through its platform up to December 31, 2015.
CCRN vs LC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $236.8M | $252.3M |
| Net Profit | $-82.9M | $51.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -30.2% | — |
| Net Margin | -35.0% | 20.5% |
| Revenue YoY | -23.6% | 15.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -2109.7% | 341.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.56 | $0.44 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $252.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $236.8M | $266.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $250.1M | $266.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $274.1M | $248.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $293.4M | $217.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $309.9M | $217.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $315.1M | $201.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $339.8M | $187.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $51.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-82.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.8M | $44.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-6.7M | $38.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-490.0K | $11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6M | $14.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-16.1M | $14.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -30.2% | 18.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.4% | 21.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.1% | 21.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.3% | 7.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.1% | 5.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | 8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.7% | 10.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | 20.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | -35.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.9% | 16.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.4% | 15.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.2% | 5.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.8% | 7.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.7% | 8.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.44 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-2.56 | $0.36 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.15 | $0.37 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.20 | $0.33 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.02 | $0.10 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.13 | $0.08 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.08 | $0.13 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.47 | $0.13 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $108.7M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $322.8M | $1.5B |
| Total Assets | $449.0M | $11.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $108.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $99.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $81.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $80.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $81.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $64.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $69.6M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $0 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $322.8M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $408.1M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $412.2M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $418.2M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $419.0M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $424.7M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $433.3M | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | $11.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $449.0M | $11.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $538.2M | $11.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $553.8M | $10.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $576.2M | $10.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $589.3M | $10.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $597.4M | $11.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $602.9M | $9.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $18.2M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $16.1M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.8% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.9% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $40.1M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $18.2M | $-2.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $20.1M | $-770.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.2M | $-713.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.7M | $-339.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $24.2M | $-2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.5M | $-669.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $82.4M | $-932.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $16.1M | $-2.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.9M | $-791.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3M | $-803.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.8M | $-352.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.7M | $-2.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.3M | $-682.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $79.6M | $-945.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.8% | -1076.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.2% | -297.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | -323.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.3% | -161.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.0% | -1237.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | -338.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.4% | -504.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.9% | 52.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.9% | 7.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.7% | 36.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.6% | 6.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.8% | 25.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.4% | 6.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.8% | 6.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -17.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -18.68× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -29.07× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.92× | -46.33× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -62.57× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CCRN
| Temporary Staffing Services | $189.6M | 80% |
| Physician Staffing | $42.5M | 18% |
| Other Services | $4.7M | 2% |
LC
Segment breakdown not available.
