vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CROSS COUNTRY HEALTHCARE INC (CCRN) and MATTHEWS INTERNATIONAL CORP (MATW). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MATTHEWS INTERNATIONAL CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($284.8M vs $236.8M, roughly 1.2× CROSS COUNTRY HEALTHCARE INC). MATTHEWS INTERNATIONAL CORP runs the higher net margin — 15.3% vs -35.0%, a 50.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CROSS COUNTRY HEALTHCARE INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-23.6% vs -29.1%). CROSS COUNTRY HEALTHCARE INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($16.1M vs $-57.2M).
GE Healthcare Technologies, Inc. is an American health technology company based in Chicago, Illinois. The company, which stylizes its own name as GE HealthCare, operates four divisions: Medical imaging, which includes molecular imaging, computed tomography, magnetic resonance, women’s health screening and X-ray systems; Ultrasound; Patient Care Solutions, which is focused on remote patient monitoring, anesthesia and respiratory care, diagnostic cardiology, and infant care; and Pharmaceutical ...
Matthews Aurora Funeral Solutions is one of the largest manufacturers of caskets and funerary urns in the United States, selling over 38% of the country's caskets as of 2005. The Aurora, Indiana–based company is a subsidiary of Pittsburgh-based Matthews International. The company makes both wooden and metal caskets and urns for holding cremated remains. It also provides supplies and consulting services for funeral homes.
CCRN vs MATW — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $236.8M | $284.8M |
| Net Profit | $-82.9M | $43.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 35.0% |
| Operating Margin | -30.2% | 34.2% |
| Net Margin | -35.0% | 15.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -23.6% | -29.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -2109.7% | 1356.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.56 | $1.39 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $236.8M | $284.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $250.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $274.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $293.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $309.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $315.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $339.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $379.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-82.9M | $43.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-6.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-490.0K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-16.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 35.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | -30.2% | 34.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | -35.0% | 15.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-2.56 | $1.39 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.15 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.20 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.02 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.13 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.08 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.47 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.08 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $108.7M | $31.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $529.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $322.8M | $543.2M |
| Total Assets | $449.0M | $1.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.98× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $108.7M | $31.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $99.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $81.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $80.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $81.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $64.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $69.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $529.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $322.8M | $543.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $408.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $412.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $418.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $419.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $424.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $433.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $462.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | $449.0M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $538.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $553.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $576.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $589.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $597.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $602.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $648.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.98× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $18.2M | $-52.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $16.1M | $-57.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.8% | -20.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.9% | 1.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -1.19× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $40.1M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $18.2M | $-52.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $20.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $24.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $82.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $16.1M | $-57.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $79.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | 6.8% | -20.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.9% | 1.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -1.19× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.92× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.23× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CCRN
| Temporary Staffing Services | $189.6M | 80% |
| Physician Staffing | $42.5M | 18% |
| Other Services | $4.7M | 2% |
MATW
Segment breakdown not available.
