vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CROSS COUNTRY HEALTHCARE INC (CCRN) and NU SKIN ENTERPRISES, INC. (NUS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
NU SKIN ENTERPRISES, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($370.3M vs $236.8M, roughly 1.6× CROSS COUNTRY HEALTHCARE INC). NU SKIN ENTERPRISES, INC. runs the higher net margin — 3.9% vs -35.0%, a 38.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, NU SKIN ENTERPRISES, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-16.9% vs -23.6%). CROSS COUNTRY HEALTHCARE INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($16.1M vs $5.9M). Over the past eight quarters, NU SKIN ENTERPRISES, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (-5.8% CAGR vs -21.0%).
GE Healthcare Technologies, Inc. is an American health technology company based in Chicago, Illinois. The company, which stylizes its own name as GE HealthCare, operates four divisions: Medical imaging, which includes molecular imaging, computed tomography, magnetic resonance, women’s health screening and X-ray systems; Ultrasound; Patient Care Solutions, which is focused on remote patient monitoring, anesthesia and respiratory care, diagnostic cardiology, and infant care; and Pharmaceutical ...
Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. is an American multilevel marketing company that develops and sells personal care products and dietary and nutritional supplements. Under the Nu Skin and Pharmanex brands, the company sells its products in 54 markets through a network of approximately 1.2 million independent distributors.
CCRN vs NUS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $236.8M | $370.3M |
| Net Profit | $-82.9M | $14.5M |
| Gross Margin | — | 70.7% |
| Operating Margin | -30.2% | 6.3% |
| Net Margin | -35.0% | 3.9% |
| Revenue YoY | -23.6% | -16.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -2109.7% | 140.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.56 | $0.27 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $236.8M | $370.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $250.1M | $364.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $274.1M | $386.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $293.4M | $364.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $309.9M | $445.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $315.1M | $430.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $339.8M | $439.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $379.2M | $417.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-82.9M | $14.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.8M | $17.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-6.7M | $21.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-490.0K | $107.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.8M | $-36.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6M | $8.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-16.1M | $-118.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.7M | $-533.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | 70.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.4% | 70.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.4% | 68.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.0% | 67.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 62.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.4% | 70.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.8% | 70.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.4% | 70.5% |
| Q4 25 | -30.2% | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.4% | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.1% | 8.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.3% | -2.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.1% | -11.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | 4.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.7% | -28.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.8% | 2.1% |
| Q4 25 | -35.0% | 3.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.9% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.4% | 5.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.2% | 29.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.2% | -8.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.8% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.7% | -26.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.7% | -0.1% |
| Q4 25 | $-2.56 | $0.27 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.15 | $0.34 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.20 | $0.43 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.02 | $2.14 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.13 | $-0.73 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.08 | $0.17 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.47 | $-2.38 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.08 | $-0.01 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $108.7M | $239.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $322.8M | $805.2M |
| Total Assets | $449.0M | $1.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $108.7M | $239.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $99.1M | $253.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $81.2M | $265.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $80.7M | $213.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $81.6M | $198.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $64.0M | $237.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $69.6M | $232.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.2M | $221.2M |
| Q4 25 | $322.8M | $805.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $408.1M | $799.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $412.2M | $787.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $418.2M | $754.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $419.0M | $651.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $424.7M | $706.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $433.3M | $686.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $462.4M | $810.2M |
| Q4 25 | $449.0M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $538.2M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $553.8M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $576.2M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $589.3M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $597.4M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $602.9M | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $648.4M | $1.7B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $18.2M | $16.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $16.1M | $5.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.8% | 1.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.9% | 2.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.15× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $40.1M | $46.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $18.2M | $16.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $20.1M | $27.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.2M | $35.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.7M | $389.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $24.2M | $25.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.5M | $31.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $82.4M | $51.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.0M | $3.3M |
| Q4 25 | $16.1M | $5.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.9M | $17.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3M | $35.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.8M | $-13.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.7M | $13.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.3M | $22.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $79.6M | $43.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.8M | $-9.0M |
| Q4 25 | 6.8% | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.2% | 4.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | 9.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.3% | -3.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.0% | 3.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.4% | 9.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.0% | -2.1% |
| Q4 25 | 0.9% | 2.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.9% | 2.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.7% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.6% | 3.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.8% | 2.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.4% | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.8% | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.6% | 2.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.15× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.61× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.69× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.92× | 3.79× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.23× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CCRN
| Temporary Staffing Services | $189.6M | 80% |
| Physician Staffing | $42.5M | 18% |
| Other Services | $4.7M | 2% |
NUS
| Other | $161.9M | 44% |
| Mainland China Segment | $52.0M | 14% |
| Southeast Asia Pacific Segment | $50.5M | 14% |
| Europe And Africa Segment | $41.8M | 11% |
| Hong Kong Taiwan Segment | $29.6M | 8% |
| South Korea Segment | $28.4M | 8% |
| Rhyz Other Segment | $6.1M | 2% |
