vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CROSS COUNTRY HEALTHCARE INC (CCRN) and RADIANT LOGISTICS, INC (RLGT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CROSS COUNTRY HEALTHCARE INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($236.8M vs $232.1M, roughly 1.0× RADIANT LOGISTICS, INC). RADIANT LOGISTICS, INC runs the higher net margin — 2.3% vs -35.0%, a 37.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, RADIANT LOGISTICS, INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-12.3% vs -23.6%). CROSS COUNTRY HEALTHCARE INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($16.1M vs $11.6M). Over the past eight quarters, RADIANT LOGISTICS, INC's revenue compounded faster (12.1% CAGR vs -21.0%).
GE Healthcare Technologies, Inc. is an American health technology company based in Chicago, Illinois. The company, which stylizes its own name as GE HealthCare, operates four divisions: Medical imaging, which includes molecular imaging, computed tomography, magnetic resonance, women’s health screening and X-ray systems; Ultrasound; Patient Care Solutions, which is focused on remote patient monitoring, anesthesia and respiratory care, diagnostic cardiology, and infant care; and Pharmaceutical ...
Radiant Logistics, Inc. is a leading third-party logistics provider offering end-to-end supply chain solutions, domestic and international freight forwarding, warehousing, and last-mile delivery services. It primarily serves North American markets, with key client segments including retail, manufacturing, e-commerce, and industrial sectors, helping businesses optimize logistics workflows and cut operational costs.
CCRN vs RLGT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $236.8M | $232.1M |
| Net Profit | $-82.9M | $5.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -30.2% | 3.2% |
| Net Margin | -35.0% | 2.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -23.6% | -12.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -2109.7% | -18.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.56 | $0.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $236.8M | $232.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $250.1M | $226.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $274.1M | $220.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $293.4M | $214.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $309.9M | $264.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $315.1M | $203.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $339.8M | $206.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $379.2M | $184.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-82.9M | $5.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.8M | $1.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-6.7M | $4.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-490.0K | $2.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.8M | $6.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6M | $3.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-16.1M | $4.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.7M | $-703.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | -30.2% | 3.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.4% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.1% | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.3% | 1.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.1% | 3.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.7% | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.8% | -0.5% |
| Q4 25 | -35.0% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.9% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.4% | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.2% | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.2% | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.8% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.7% | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.7% | -0.4% |
| Q4 25 | $-2.56 | $0.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.15 | $0.03 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.20 | $0.10 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.02 | $0.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.13 | $0.13 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.08 | $0.07 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.47 | $0.11 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.08 | $-0.02 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $108.7M | $31.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $322.8M | $229.8M |
| Total Assets | $449.0M | $439.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $108.7M | $31.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $99.1M | $28.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $81.2M | $22.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $80.7M | $19.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $81.6M | $19.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $64.0M | $10.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $69.6M | $24.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.2M | $31.2M |
| Q4 25 | $322.8M | $229.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $408.1M | $225.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $412.2M | $226.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $418.2M | $218.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $419.0M | $214.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $424.7M | $212.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $433.3M | $209.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $462.4M | $206.0M |
| Q4 25 | $449.0M | $439.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $538.2M | $445.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $553.8M | $426.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $576.2M | $414.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $589.3M | $386.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $597.4M | $375.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $602.9M | $371.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $648.4M | $364.0M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $18.2M | $12.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $16.1M | $11.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.8% | 5.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.9% | 0.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 2.33× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $40.1M | $8.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $18.2M | $12.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $20.1M | $2.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.2M | $3.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.7M | $-5.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $24.2M | $15.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.5M | $205.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $82.4M | $1.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.0M | $3.9M |
| Q4 25 | $16.1M | $11.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.9M | $977.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3M | $2.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.8M | $-6.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.7M | $14.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.3M | $-1.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $79.6M | $-185.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.8M | $1.8M |
| Q4 25 | 6.8% | 5.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.2% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.3% | -3.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.0% | 5.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | -0.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.4% | -0.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.0% | 1.0% |
| Q4 25 | 0.9% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.9% | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.7% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.6% | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.8% | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.4% | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.8% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.6% | 1.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.33× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.90× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.63× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -2.26× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.43× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.92× | 0.06× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.26× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.23× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CCRN
| Temporary Staffing Services | $189.6M | 80% |
| Physician Staffing | $42.5M | 18% |
| Other Services | $4.7M | 2% |
RLGT
| Transferred Over Time | $201.2M | 87% |
| Other | $25.0M | 11% |
| Value Added Services | $4.2M | 2% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $1.8M | 1% |
