vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CROSS COUNTRY HEALTHCARE INC (CCRN) and Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. (SHLS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CROSS COUNTRY HEALTHCARE INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($236.8M vs $148.3M, roughly 1.6× Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.). Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 5.5% vs -35.0%, a 40.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (38.6% vs -23.6%). CROSS COUNTRY HEALTHCARE INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($16.1M vs $-11.3M). Over the past eight quarters, Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (27.8% CAGR vs -21.0%).
GE Healthcare Technologies, Inc. is an American health technology company based in Chicago, Illinois. The company, which stylizes its own name as GE HealthCare, operates four divisions: Medical imaging, which includes molecular imaging, computed tomography, magnetic resonance, women’s health screening and X-ray systems; Ultrasound; Patient Care Solutions, which is focused on remote patient monitoring, anesthesia and respiratory care, diagnostic cardiology, and infant care; and Pharmaceutical ...
Shoals Technologies Group is a leading provider of electrical balance of systems solutions for renewable energy and e-mobility. It supplies connectivity components for solar projects, energy storage systems and EV charging infrastructure, serving clients across North America, Europe and Asia-Pacific.
CCRN vs SHLS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $236.8M | $148.3M |
| Net Profit | $-82.9M | $8.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 31.6% |
| Operating Margin | -30.2% | 11.7% |
| Net Margin | -35.0% | 5.5% |
| Revenue YoY | -23.6% | 38.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -2109.7% | 3.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.56 | $0.05 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $236.8M | $148.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $250.1M | $135.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $274.1M | $110.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $293.4M | $80.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $309.9M | $107.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $315.1M | $102.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $339.8M | $99.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $379.2M | $90.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-82.9M | $8.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.8M | $11.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-6.7M | $13.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-490.0K | $-282.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.8M | $7.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6M | $-267.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-16.1M | $11.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.7M | $4.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 31.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.4% | 37.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.4% | 37.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.0% | 35.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 37.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.4% | 24.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.8% | 40.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.4% | 40.2% |
| Q4 25 | -30.2% | 11.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.4% | 13.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.1% | 14.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.3% | 5.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.1% | 15.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | 4.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.7% | 18.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.8% | 12.8% |
| Q4 25 | -35.0% | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.9% | 8.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.4% | 12.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.2% | -0.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.2% | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.8% | -0.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.7% | 11.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.7% | 5.3% |
| Q4 25 | $-2.56 | $0.05 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.15 | $0.07 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.20 | $0.08 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.02 | $0.00 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.13 | $0.04 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.08 | $0.00 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.47 | $0.07 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.08 | $0.03 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $108.7M | $7.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $322.8M | $600.0M |
| Total Assets | $449.0M | $904.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $108.7M | $7.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $99.1M | $8.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $81.2M | $4.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $80.7M | $35.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $81.6M | $23.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $64.0M | $11.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $69.6M | $3.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.2M | $15.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $141.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $141.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $141.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $146.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $168.8M |
| Q4 25 | $322.8M | $600.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $408.1M | $589.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $412.2M | $575.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $418.2M | $558.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $419.0M | $556.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $424.7M | $545.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $433.3M | $544.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $462.4M | $554.0M |
| Q4 25 | $449.0M | $904.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $538.2M | $851.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $553.8M | $795.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $576.2M | $788.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $589.3M | $793.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $597.4M | $801.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $602.9M | $788.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $648.4M | $825.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.25× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.25× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.26× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.27× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.30× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $18.2M | $-4.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $16.1M | $-11.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.8% | -7.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.9% | 4.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -0.50× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $40.1M | $-16.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $18.2M | $-4.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $20.1M | $19.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.2M | $-13.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.7M | $15.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $24.2M | $14.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.5M | $15.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $82.4M | $37.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.0M | $12.9M |
| Q4 25 | $16.1M | $-11.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.9M | $9.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3M | $-26.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.8M | $12.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.7M | $12.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.3M | $13.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $79.6M | $35.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.8M | $10.4M |
| Q4 25 | 6.8% | -7.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.2% | 6.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | -23.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.3% | 15.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.0% | 11.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | 13.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.4% | 36.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.0% | 11.4% |
| Q4 25 | 0.9% | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.9% | 7.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.7% | 11.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.6% | 4.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.8% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.4% | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.8% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.6% | 2.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | -0.50× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.63× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -1.00× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.79× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.92× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.21× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.23× | 2.69× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CCRN
| Temporary Staffing Services | $189.6M | 80% |
| Physician Staffing | $42.5M | 18% |
| Other Services | $4.7M | 2% |
SHLS
| System Solutions | $122.0M | 82% |
| Components | $26.3M | 18% |
