vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Celanese Corp (CE) and Chefs' Warehouse, Inc. (CHEF). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Celanese Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.2B vs $1.1B, roughly 2.1× Chefs' Warehouse, Inc.). Chefs' Warehouse, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 1.6% vs 0.6%, a 1.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Chefs' Warehouse, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.4% vs -7.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Chefs' Warehouse, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (5.3% CAGR vs -8.1%).
Celanese Corporation, formerly known as Hoechst Celanese, is an American technology and specialty materials company headquartered in Irving, Texas. It is a Fortune 500 corporation. The company is the world's leading producer of acetic acid, producing about 1.95 million tonnes per year, representing approximately 20% of global production. Celanese is also the world's largest producer of vinyl acetate monomer (VAM).
Chefs' Warehouse, Inc. is a leading North American specialty food distributor that primarily serves independent restaurants, fine dining venues, hotels, catering firms, and other foodservice operators. It offers a curated portfolio of over 150,000 products including artisanal ingredients, specialty meats, seafood, dairy, pastries, and imported gourmet goods tailored for professional chefs.
CE vs CHEF — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.2B | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $14.0M | $17.4M |
| Gross Margin | 19.1% | 24.3% |
| Operating Margin | 4.0% | 3.1% |
| Net Margin | 0.6% | 1.6% |
| Revenue YoY | -7.0% | 11.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 100.7% | 68.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.13 | $0.40 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4B | $950.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | $931.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $954.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | $17.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $14.0M | $21.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.4B | $19.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $199.0M | $21.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-21.0M | $10.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.9B | $23.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.0M | $14.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $155.0M | $15.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | 24.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 19.1% | 24.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.5% | 24.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.1% | 24.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.9% | 23.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.7% | 24.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.5% | 24.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.2% | 24.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.0% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -52.7% | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.2% | 3.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.0% | 2.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -59.3% | 4.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.4% | 3.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.4% | 3.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -56.1% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.9% | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.9% | 1.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -80.8% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.4% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.8% | 1.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.40 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.13 | $0.50 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-12.39 | $0.44 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.81 | $0.49 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.19 | $0.25 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-17.50 | $0.56 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.06 | $0.34 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.41 | $0.37 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $122.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $11.4B | $750.4M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.0B | $608.6M |
| Total Assets | $21.7B | $2.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.81× | 1.23× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $122.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $121.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $65.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $96.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $116.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $114.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $50.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $38.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | $750.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $11.4B | $720.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.7B | $711.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.7B | $690.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.4B | $681.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.1B | $688.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.3B | $666.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.1B | $660.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | $608.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.0B | $604.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0B | $576.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3B | $557.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.2B | $541.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.2B | $537.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.3B | $480.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.2B | $461.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $21.7B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.2B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.7B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.2B | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.9B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.9B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.8B | $1.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.23× | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.81× | 1.19× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.95× | 1.23× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.41× | 1.24× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.39× | 1.26× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.14× | 1.28× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.56× | 1.39× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.54× | 1.43× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $252.0M | $38.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $168.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.6% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.8% | 0.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 18.00× | 2.20× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $803.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $38.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $252.0M | $73.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $447.0M | $-8.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $410.0M | $14.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $37.0M | $49.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $494.0M | $73.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.0M | $19.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $292.0M | $29.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $168.0M | $65.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $383.0M | $-19.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $317.0M | $4.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-65.0M | $37.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $389.0M | $64.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.0M | $11.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $187.0M | $13.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.6% | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.8% | -1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.5% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.7% | 3.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.4% | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.3% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.1% | 1.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.8% | 0.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.3% | 1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.4% | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.3% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | 1.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 2.20× | ||
| Q4 25 | 18.00× | 3.41× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -0.46× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.06× | 0.68× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.82× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.05× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.68× | 1.41× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.88× | 1.89× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CE
| Engineered Materials | $1.3B | 58% |
| Acetyl Chain | $940.0M | 43% |
CHEF
Segment breakdown not available.
