vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Celanese Corp (CE) and C.H. Robinson (CHRW). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
C.H. Robinson is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.9B vs $2.2B, roughly 1.8× Celanese Corp). C.H. Robinson runs the higher net margin — 3.5% vs 0.6%, a 2.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, C.H. Robinson posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-6.5% vs -7.0%). C.H. Robinson produced more free cash flow last quarter ($302.4M vs $168.0M). Over the past eight quarters, C.H. Robinson's revenue compounded faster (-5.8% CAGR vs -8.1%).
Celanese Corporation, formerly known as Hoechst Celanese, is an American technology and specialty materials company headquartered in Irving, Texas. It is a Fortune 500 corporation. The company is the world's leading producer of acetic acid, producing about 1.95 million tonnes per year, representing approximately 20% of global production. Celanese is also the world's largest producer of vinyl acetate monomer (VAM).
C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. is an American transportation company that includes third-party logistics (3PL). The company offers freight transportation, transportation management, brokerage and warehousing. It offers truckload, less than truckload, air freight, intermodal, and ocean transportation.
CE vs CHRW — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.2B | $3.9B |
| Net Profit | $14.0M | $136.3M |
| Gross Margin | 19.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | 4.0% | 4.6% |
| Net Margin | 0.6% | 3.5% |
| Revenue YoY | -7.0% | -6.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 100.7% | -8.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.13 | $1.12 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | $3.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $4.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $4.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4B | $4.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | $4.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $4.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6B | $4.4B |
| Q4 25 | $14.0M | $136.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.4B | $163.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $199.0M | $152.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-21.0M | $135.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.9B | $149.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.0M | $97.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $155.0M | $126.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $121.0M | $92.9M |
| Q4 25 | 19.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 21.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.0% | 4.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -52.7% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.2% | 5.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.0% | 4.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -59.3% | 4.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.4% | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.4% | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.0% | 2.9% |
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | 3.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -56.1% | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.9% | 3.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.9% | 3.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -80.8% | 3.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.4% | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.8% | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.6% | 2.1% |
| Q4 25 | $0.13 | $1.12 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-12.39 | $1.34 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.81 | $1.26 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.19 | $1.11 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-17.50 | $1.23 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.06 | $0.80 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.41 | $1.05 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.10 | $0.78 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $160.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $11.4B | $1.1B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.0B | $1.8B |
| Total Assets | $21.7B | $5.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.81× | 0.59× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $160.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $136.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $156.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $129.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $145.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $131.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $113.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $121.8M |
| Q4 25 | $11.4B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.7B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.7B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.4B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.1B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.3B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.1B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.0B | $1.7B |
| Q4 25 | $4.0B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.2B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.2B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.3B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.2B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.1B | $1.4B |
| Q4 25 | $21.7B | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.2B | $5.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.7B | $5.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.2B | $5.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.9B | $5.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.9B | $5.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.8B | $5.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $26.0B | $5.5B |
| Q4 25 | 2.81× | 0.59× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.95× | 0.64× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.41× | 0.76× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.39× | 0.80× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.14× | 0.80× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.56× | 0.95× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.54× | 1.07× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.56× | 1.19× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $252.0M | $305.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $168.0M | $302.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.6% | 7.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.8% | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 18.00× | 2.24× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $803.0M | $894.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $252.0M | $305.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $447.0M | $275.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $410.0M | $227.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $37.0M | $106.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $494.0M | $267.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.0M | $108.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $292.0M | $166.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $101.0M | $-33.3M |
| Q4 25 | $168.0M | $302.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $383.0M | $269.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $317.0M | $219.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-65.0M | $103.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $389.0M | $265.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.0M | $103.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $187.0M | $159.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-36.0M | $-41.9M |
| Q4 25 | 7.6% | 7.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.8% | 6.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.5% | 5.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.7% | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.4% | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.3% | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.1% | 3.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.4% | -1.0% |
| Q4 25 | 3.8% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.3% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.4% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.3% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.2% | 0.2% |
| Q4 25 | 18.00× | 2.24× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.69× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.06× | 1.49× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.79× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.79× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.68× | 1.11× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.88× | 1.32× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.83× | -0.36× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CE
| Engineered Materials | $1.3B | 58% |
| Acetyl Chain | $940.0M | 43% |
CHRW
| North American Service Transportation NAST | $2.8B | 72% |
| Global Forwarding | $731.0M | 19% |
| Sourcing | $340.9M | 9% |
