vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Celanese Corp (CE) and Dover Corporation (DOV). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Celanese Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.2B vs $2.1B, roughly 1.0× Dover Corporation). Dover Corporation runs the higher net margin — 13.4% vs 0.6%, a 12.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Dover Corporation posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.5% vs -7.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Dover Corporation's revenue compounded faster (-1.8% CAGR vs -8.1%).
Celanese Corporation, formerly known as Hoechst Celanese, is an American technology and specialty materials company headquartered in Irving, Texas. It is a Fortune 500 corporation. The company is the world's leading producer of acetic acid, producing about 1.95 million tonnes per year, representing approximately 20% of global production. Celanese is also the world's largest producer of vinyl acetate monomer (VAM).
Dover Corporation is an American conglomerate manufacturer of industrial products. The Downers Grove, Illinois-based company was founded in 1955. As of 2021, Dover's business was divided into five segments: Engineered Products, Clean Energy and Fueling, Imaging & Identification, Pumps & Process Solutions and Climate and Sustainability Technologies. Dover is a constituent of the S&P 500 index and trades on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol DOV. Dover was ranked 448 in the 2024 Fortu...
CE vs DOV — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.2B | $2.1B |
| Net Profit | $14.0M | $282.1M |
| Gross Margin | 19.1% | 39.1% |
| Operating Margin | 4.0% | 16.5% |
| Net Margin | 0.6% | 13.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -7.0% | 12.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 100.7% | 22.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.13 | $2.06 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $2.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | $282.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $14.0M | $282.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.4B | $302.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $199.0M | $279.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-21.0M | $230.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.9B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.0M | $347.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $155.0M | $281.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | 39.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 19.1% | 39.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.5% | 40.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.1% | 39.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.9% | 40.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.7% | 41.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.5% | 38.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.2% | 37.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 16.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.0% | 16.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -52.7% | 18.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.2% | 17.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.0% | 15.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -59.3% | 14.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.4% | 16.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.4% | 17.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | 13.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | 13.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -56.1% | 14.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.9% | 13.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.9% | 12.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -80.8% | 96.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.4% | 17.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.8% | 12.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.06 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.13 | $2.06 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-12.39 | $2.19 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.81 | $2.02 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.19 | $1.67 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-17.50 | $10.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.06 | $2.51 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.41 | $2.04 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $11.4B | $3.3B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.0B | $7.4B |
| Total Assets | $21.7B | $13.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.81× | 0.45× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $3.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $11.4B | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.7B | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.7B | $3.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.4B | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.1B | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.3B | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.1B | $3.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | $7.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.0B | $7.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0B | $7.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3B | $7.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.2B | $7.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.2B | $7.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.3B | $5.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.2B | $5.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | $13.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $21.7B | $13.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.2B | $13.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.7B | $13.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.2B | $12.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.9B | $12.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.9B | $11.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.8B | $11.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.45× | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.81× | 0.45× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.95× | 0.40× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.41× | 0.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.39× | 0.42× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.14× | 0.42× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.56× | 0.53× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.54× | 0.55× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $252.0M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $168.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.6% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.8% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 18.00× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $803.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $252.0M | $543.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $447.0M | $424.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $410.0M | $212.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $37.0M | $157.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $494.0M | $439.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.0M | $353.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $292.0M | $203.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $168.0M | $487.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $383.0M | $370.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $317.0M | $151.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-65.0M | $109.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $389.0M | $385.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.0M | $325.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $187.0M | $162.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.6% | 23.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.8% | 17.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.5% | 7.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.7% | 5.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.4% | 25.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.3% | 16.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.1% | 7.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.8% | 2.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | 2.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.3% | 2.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.4% | 3.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.3% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | 1.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 18.00× | 1.93× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.40× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.06× | 0.76× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.68× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.31× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.68× | 1.02× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.88× | 0.72× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CE
| Engineered Materials | $1.3B | 58% |
| Acetyl Chain | $940.0M | 43% |
DOV
Segment breakdown not available.
