vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Celanese Corp (CE) and Gen Digital (GEN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Celanese Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.2B vs $1.2B, roughly 1.8× Gen Digital). Gen Digital runs the higher net margin — 15.5% vs 0.6%, a 14.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Gen Digital posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (28.5% vs -7.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Gen Digital's revenue compounded faster (13.2% CAGR vs -8.1%).
Celanese Corporation, formerly known as Hoechst Celanese, is an American technology and specialty materials company headquartered in Irving, Texas. It is a Fortune 500 corporation. The company is the world's leading producer of acetic acid, producing about 1.95 million tonnes per year, representing approximately 20% of global production. Celanese is also the world's largest producer of vinyl acetate monomer (VAM).
Gen Digital Inc. is a multinational software company co-headquartered in both Tempe, Arizona (USA) and Prague, Czech Republic (EU). The company provides cybersecurity software, financial technology, and services. Gen is a Fortune 500 company and a member of the S&P 500 stock-market index. It is listed at both NASDAQ and Prague Stock Exchange. Its portfolio includes Norton, Avast, LifeLock, Avira, AVG, ReputationDefender, MoneyLion and CCleaner.
CE vs GEN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.2B | $1.2B |
| Net Profit | $14.0M | $192.0M |
| Gross Margin | 19.1% | 78.4% |
| Operating Margin | 4.0% | 34.9% |
| Net Margin | 0.6% | 15.5% |
| Revenue YoY | -7.0% | 28.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 100.7% | 6.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.13 | $0.31 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4B | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | $986.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | $974.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $965.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $192.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $14.0M | $134.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.4B | $135.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $199.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-21.0M | $142.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.9B | $159.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.0M | $161.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $155.0M | $181.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 78.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 19.1% | 78.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.5% | 78.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.9% | 80.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.7% | 80.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.5% | 80.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.2% | 80.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 34.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.0% | 35.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -52.7% | 35.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.0% | 41.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -59.3% | 37.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.4% | 41.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.4% | 43.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | 15.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | 11.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -56.1% | 10.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.9% | 14.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -80.8% | 16.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.4% | 16.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.8% | 18.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.31 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.13 | $0.21 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-12.39 | $0.22 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.81 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.19 | $0.22 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-17.50 | $0.26 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.06 | $0.26 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.41 | $0.29 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $11.4B | $8.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.0B | $2.3B |
| Total Assets | $21.7B | $15.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.81× | 3.61× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $883.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $737.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $644.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $8.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $11.4B | $8.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.7B | $8.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.7B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.4B | $8.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.1B | $8.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.3B | $8.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.1B | $8.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.0B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.2B | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.2B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.3B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.2B | $2.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | $15.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $21.7B | $16.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.2B | $16.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.7B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.2B | $15.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.9B | $15.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.9B | $15.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.8B | $15.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.61× | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.81× | 3.54× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.95× | 3.75× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.41× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.39× | 3.64× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.14× | 3.94× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.56× | 4.06× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.54× | 4.33× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $252.0M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $168.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.6% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.8% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 18.00× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $803.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $252.0M | $541.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $447.0M | $409.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $410.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $37.0M | $473.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $494.0M | $326.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.0M | $158.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $292.0M | $264.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $168.0M | $535.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $383.0M | $405.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $317.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-65.0M | $470.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $389.0M | $318.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.0M | $156.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $187.0M | $262.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.6% | 43.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.8% | 32.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.7% | 46.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.4% | 32.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.3% | 16.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.1% | 27.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.8% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.3% | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.4% | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.3% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | 0.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 18.00× | 4.04× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.03× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.06× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.33× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.05× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.68× | 0.98× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.88× | 1.46× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CE
| Engineered Materials | $1.3B | 58% |
| Acetyl Chain | $940.0M | 43% |
GEN
| Cyber Safety Platform | $819.0M | 66% |
| Trust Based Solutions | $421.0M | 34% |
| Net Interest Income On Notes Receivable | $4.0M | 0% |
