vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Celanese Corp (CE) and MERCURY GENERAL CORP (MCY). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Celanese Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.2B vs $1.5B, roughly 1.4× MERCURY GENERAL CORP). MERCURY GENERAL CORP runs the higher net margin — 13.2% vs 0.6%, a 12.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, MERCURY GENERAL CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.4% vs -7.0%). MERCURY GENERAL CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($273.9M vs $168.0M). Over the past eight quarters, MERCURY GENERAL CORP's revenue compounded faster (9.8% CAGR vs -8.1%).
Celanese Corporation, formerly known as Hoechst Celanese, is an American technology and specialty materials company headquartered in Irving, Texas. It is a Fortune 500 corporation. The company is the world's leading producer of acetic acid, producing about 1.95 million tonnes per year, representing approximately 20% of global production. Celanese is also the world's largest producer of vinyl acetate monomer (VAM).
Mercury General Corporation is a multiple-line insurance organization that offers personal automobiles, homeowners, renters, and business insurance. Mercury's primary focus is automobiles and homeowners' insurance.
CE vs MCY — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.2B | $1.5B |
| Net Profit | $14.0M | $202.5M |
| Gross Margin | 19.1% | 99.7% |
| Operating Margin | 4.0% | 16.2% |
| Net Margin | 0.6% | 13.2% |
| Revenue YoY | -7.0% | 12.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 100.7% | 100.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.13 | $3.66 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6B | $1.3B |
| Q4 25 | $14.0M | $202.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.4B | $280.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $199.0M | $166.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-21.0M | $-108.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.9B | $101.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.0M | $230.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $155.0M | $62.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $121.0M | $73.5M |
| Q4 25 | 19.1% | 99.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.5% | 99.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.1% | 99.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.9% | 99.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.7% | 99.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.5% | 99.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.2% | 99.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 21.2% | 99.7% |
| Q4 25 | 4.0% | 16.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -52.7% | 22.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.2% | 14.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.0% | -10.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -59.3% | 9.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.4% | 18.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.4% | 5.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.0% | 7.0% |
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | 13.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -56.1% | 17.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.9% | 11.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.9% | -7.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -80.8% | 7.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.4% | 15.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.8% | 4.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.6% | 5.8% |
| Q4 25 | $0.13 | $3.66 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-12.39 | $5.06 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.81 | $3.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.19 | $-1.96 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-17.50 | $1.82 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.06 | $4.17 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.41 | $1.13 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.10 | $1.33 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $11.4B | $575.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.0B | $2.4B |
| Total Assets | $21.7B | $9.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.81× | 0.24× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $11.4B | $575.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.7B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.7B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.4B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.1B | $575.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.3B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.1B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.0B | — |
| Q4 25 | $4.0B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0B | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3B | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.2B | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.2B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.3B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.2B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.1B | $1.6B |
| Q4 25 | $21.7B | $9.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.2B | $9.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.7B | $9.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.2B | $9.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.9B | $8.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.9B | $8.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.8B | $7.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $26.0B | $7.4B |
| Q4 25 | 2.81× | 0.24× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.95× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.41× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.39× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.14× | 0.30× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.56× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.54× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.56× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $252.0M | $287.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $168.0M | $273.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.6% | 17.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.8% | 0.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 18.00× | 1.42× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $803.0M | $1.0B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $252.0M | $287.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $447.0M | $496.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $410.0M | $371.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $37.0M | $-68.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $494.0M | $248.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.0M | $318.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $292.0M | $278.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $101.0M | $192.6M |
| Q4 25 | $168.0M | $273.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $383.0M | $479.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $317.0M | $357.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-65.0M | $-81.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $389.0M | $236.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.0M | $306.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $187.0M | $266.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-36.0M | $182.4M |
| Q4 25 | 7.6% | 17.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.8% | 30.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.5% | 24.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.7% | -5.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.4% | 17.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.3% | 20.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.1% | 20.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.4% | 14.3% |
| Q4 25 | 3.8% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.3% | 0.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.4% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.3% | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | 0.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.2% | 0.8% |
| Q4 25 | 18.00× | 1.42× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.77× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.06× | 2.23× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.46× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.68× | 1.38× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.88× | 4.44× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.83× | 2.62× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CE
| Engineered Materials | $1.3B | 58% |
| Acetyl Chain | $940.0M | 43% |
MCY
Segment breakdown not available.
