vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Celanese Corp (CE) and Public Storage (PSA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Celanese Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.2B vs $1.2B, roughly 1.8× Public Storage). Public Storage runs the higher net margin — 41.7% vs 0.6%, a 41.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Public Storage posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (3.3% vs -7.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Public Storage's revenue compounded faster (2.5% CAGR vs -8.1%).
Celanese Corporation, formerly known as Hoechst Celanese, is an American technology and specialty materials company headquartered in Irving, Texas. It is a Fortune 500 corporation. The company is the world's leading producer of acetic acid, producing about 1.95 million tonnes per year, representing approximately 20% of global production. Celanese is also the world's largest producer of vinyl acetate monomer (VAM).
Public Storage, headquartered in Glendale, California, is a real estate investment trust that invests in self storage. It is the largest brand of self-storage services in the US and owns approximately 9% of the self storage square footage in the U.S. As of December 31, 2024, the company operated 3,073 self-storage facilities containing an aggregate of 221 million net rentable square feet of space.
CE vs PSA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.2B | $1.2B |
| Net Profit | $14.0M | $507.1M |
| Gross Margin | 19.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | 4.0% | 40.7% |
| Net Margin | 0.6% | 41.7% |
| Revenue YoY | -7.0% | 3.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 100.7% | -17.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.13 | $2.59 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6B | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | $14.0M | $507.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.4B | $511.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $199.0M | $358.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-21.0M | $407.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.9B | $614.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.0M | $430.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $155.0M | $518.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $121.0M | $508.9M |
| Q4 25 | 19.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 21.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.0% | 40.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -52.7% | 42.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.2% | 30.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.0% | 34.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -59.3% | 52.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.4% | 36.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.4% | 44.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.0% | 44.3% |
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | 41.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -56.1% | 41.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.9% | 29.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.9% | 34.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -80.8% | 52.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.4% | 36.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.8% | 44.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.6% | 44.0% |
| Q4 25 | $0.13 | $2.59 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-12.39 | $2.62 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.81 | $1.76 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.19 | $2.04 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-17.50 | $3.22 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.06 | $2.16 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.41 | $2.66 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.10 | $2.60 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $318.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $11.4B | $10.3B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.0B | $9.2B |
| Total Assets | $21.7B | $20.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.81× | 1.11× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $318.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $296.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $287.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $447.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $599.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $542.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $271.6M |
| Q4 25 | $11.4B | $10.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.7B | $10.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.7B | $10.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.4B | $9.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.1B | $9.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.3B | $9.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.1B | $9.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.0B | $9.1B |
| Q4 25 | $4.0B | $9.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0B | $9.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3B | $9.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.2B | $9.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.2B | $9.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.3B | $9.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.2B | $9.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.1B | $9.9B |
| Q4 25 | $21.7B | $20.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.2B | $20.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.7B | $20.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.2B | $19.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.9B | $19.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.9B | $19.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.8B | $19.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $26.0B | $19.6B |
| Q4 25 | 2.81× | 1.11× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.95× | 1.08× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.41× | 1.11× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.39× | 0.99× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.14× | 0.96× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.56× | 0.99× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.54× | 0.97× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.56× | 0.91× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $252.0M | $733.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $168.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.6% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.8% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 18.00× | 1.45× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $803.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $252.0M | $733.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $447.0M | $875.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $410.0M | $872.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $37.0M | $705.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $494.0M | $768.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.0M | $798.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $292.0M | $895.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $101.0M | $665.6M |
| Q4 25 | $168.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $383.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $317.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-65.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $389.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $187.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-36.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | 7.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 18.00× | 1.45× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.71× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.06× | 2.43× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.73× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.25× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.68× | 1.86× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.88× | 1.73× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.83× | 1.31× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CE
| Engineered Materials | $1.3B | 58% |
| Acetyl Chain | $940.0M | 43% |
PSA
| Self Storage Operations | $1.1B | 93% |
| Ancillary Operations | $86.9M | 7% |
