vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Celanese Corp (CE) and SS&C Technologies Holdings Inc (SSNC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Celanese Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.2B vs $1.6B, roughly 1.3× SS&C Technologies Holdings Inc). SS&C Technologies Holdings Inc runs the higher net margin — 13.7% vs 0.6%, a 13.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SS&C Technologies Holdings Inc posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.8% vs -7.0%). Over the past eight quarters, SS&C Technologies Holdings Inc's revenue compounded faster (6.5% CAGR vs -8.1%).
Celanese Corporation, formerly known as Hoechst Celanese, is an American technology and specialty materials company headquartered in Irving, Texas. It is a Fortune 500 corporation. The company is the world's leading producer of acetic acid, producing about 1.95 million tonnes per year, representing approximately 20% of global production. Celanese is also the world's largest producer of vinyl acetate monomer (VAM).
SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc. is an American multinational holding company headquartered in Windsor, Connecticut, that sells software and software as a service to the financial services industry. The company has offices in the Americas, Europe, Asia, Africa and Australia.
CE vs SSNC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.2B | $1.6B |
| Net Profit | $14.0M | $226.1M |
| Gross Margin | 19.1% | 48.7% |
| Operating Margin | 4.0% | 24.2% |
| Net Margin | 0.6% | 13.7% |
| Revenue YoY | -7.0% | 8.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 100.7% | 6.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.13 | $0.91 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4B | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | $226.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $14.0M | $193.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.4B | $210.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $199.0M | $180.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-21.0M | $213.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.9B | $248.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.0M | $164.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $155.0M | $190.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | 48.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 19.1% | 47.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.5% | 47.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.1% | 48.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.9% | 49.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.7% | 49.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.5% | 48.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.2% | 48.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 24.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.0% | 22.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -52.7% | 23.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.2% | 22.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.0% | 23.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -59.3% | 23.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.4% | 22.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.4% | 22.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 13.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | 11.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -56.1% | 13.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.9% | 11.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.9% | 14.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -80.8% | 16.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.4% | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.8% | 13.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.91 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.13 | $0.76 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-12.39 | $0.83 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.81 | $0.72 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.19 | $0.84 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-17.50 | $0.98 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.06 | $0.65 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.41 | $0.75 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $420.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $11.4B | $7.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.0B | $6.9B |
| Total Assets | $21.7B | $20.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.81× | 1.08× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $420.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $462.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $388.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $480.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $515.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $567.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $694.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $462.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | $7.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $11.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.7B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.7B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.4B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.3B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.1B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $6.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.0B | $6.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0B | $6.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3B | $6.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.2B | $6.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.2B | $6.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.3B | $6.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.2B | $6.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | $20.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $21.7B | $20.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.2B | $19.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.7B | $19.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.2B | $20.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.9B | $19.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.9B | $18.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.8B | $16.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.08× | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.81× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.95× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.41× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.39× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.14× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.56× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.54× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $252.0M | $299.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $168.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.6% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.8% | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 18.00× | 1.33× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $803.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $299.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $252.0M | $643.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $447.0M | $456.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $410.0M | $372.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $37.0M | $272.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $494.0M | $486.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.0M | $336.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $292.0M | $384.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $168.0M | $633.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $383.0M | $421.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $317.0M | $350.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-65.0M | $259.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $389.0M | $466.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.0M | $310.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $187.0M | $374.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.6% | 38.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.8% | 26.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.5% | 22.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.7% | 17.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.4% | 30.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.3% | 21.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.1% | 25.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.8% | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.3% | 0.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.4% | 1.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.3% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | 0.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.33× | ||
| Q4 25 | 18.00× | 3.33× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.06× | 2.06× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.28× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.96× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.68× | 2.05× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.88× | 2.02× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CE
| Engineered Materials | $1.3B | 58% |
| Acetyl Chain | $940.0M | 43% |
SSNC
| Technology-enabled services | $1.4B | 85% |
| License, maintenance and related | $239.8M | 15% |
