vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Celanese Corp (CE) and Stanley Black & Decker (SWK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Stanley Black & Decker is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.8B vs $2.2B, roughly 1.7× Celanese Corp). Stanley Black & Decker runs the higher net margin — 1.4% vs 0.6%, a 0.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Stanley Black & Decker posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (0.1% vs -7.0%). Celanese Corp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($168.0M vs $155.3M). Over the past eight quarters, Stanley Black & Decker's revenue compounded faster (0.3% CAGR vs -8.1%).
Celanese Corporation, formerly known as Hoechst Celanese, is an American technology and specialty materials company headquartered in Irving, Texas. It is a Fortune 500 corporation. The company is the world's leading producer of acetic acid, producing about 1.95 million tonnes per year, representing approximately 20% of global production. Celanese is also the world's largest producer of vinyl acetate monomer (VAM).
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc., formerly known as The Stanley Works, is an American manufacturer of industrial tools and household hardware, and a provider of security products. Headquartered in the Greater Hartford city of New Britain, Connecticut, Stanley Black & Decker is the result of the merger of The Stanley Works and Black & Decker on March 12, 2010.
CE vs SWK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.2B | $3.8B |
| Net Profit | $14.0M | $51.4M |
| Gross Margin | 19.1% | 31.4% |
| Operating Margin | 4.0% | — |
| Net Margin | 0.6% | 1.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -7.0% | 0.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 100.7% | -43.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.13 | $0.34 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $3.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4B | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $4.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6B | $3.9B |
| Q4 25 | $14.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.4B | $51.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $199.0M | $101.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-21.0M | $90.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.9B | $194.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.0M | $91.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $155.0M | $-11.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $121.0M | $19.5M |
| Q4 25 | 19.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.5% | 31.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.1% | 27.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.9% | 29.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.7% | 30.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.5% | 29.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.2% | 28.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 21.2% | 28.6% |
| Q4 25 | 4.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -52.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -59.3% | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.4% | 10.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.4% | 9.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.0% | 8.3% |
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -56.1% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.9% | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.9% | 2.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -80.8% | 5.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.4% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.8% | -0.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.6% | 0.5% |
| Q4 25 | $0.13 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-12.39 | $0.34 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.81 | $0.67 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.19 | $0.60 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-17.50 | $1.29 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.06 | $0.60 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.41 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.10 | $0.13 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $268.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $11.4B | $5.3B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.0B | $9.0B |
| Total Assets | $21.7B | $21.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.81× | 0.59× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $268.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $311.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $344.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $290.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $298.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $318.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $476.6M |
| Q4 25 | $11.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.7B | $5.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.7B | $5.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.4B | $5.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.1B | $6.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.3B | $6.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.1B | $6.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.0B | $6.1B |
| Q4 25 | $4.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0B | $9.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3B | $9.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.2B | $8.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.2B | $8.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.3B | $8.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.2B | $8.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.1B | $8.9B |
| Q4 25 | $21.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.2B | $21.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.7B | $22.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.2B | $22.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.9B | $21.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.9B | $22.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.8B | $22.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $26.0B | $23.9B |
| Q4 25 | 2.81× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.95× | 0.59× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.41× | 0.62× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.39× | 0.63× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.14× | 0.70× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.56× | 0.69× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.54× | 0.70× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.56× | 0.69× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $252.0M | $221.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $168.0M | $155.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.6% | 4.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.8% | 1.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 18.00× | 4.30× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $803.0M | $369.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $252.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $447.0M | $221.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $410.0M | $214.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $37.0M | $-420.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $494.0M | $679.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.0M | $285.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $292.0M | $573.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $101.0M | $-431.0M |
| Q4 25 | $168.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $383.0M | $155.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $317.0M | $134.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-65.0M | $-485.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $389.0M | $564.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.0M | $199.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $187.0M | $485.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-36.0M | $-496.7M |
| Q4 25 | 7.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.8% | 4.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.5% | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.7% | -13.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.4% | 15.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.3% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.1% | 12.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.4% | -12.8% |
| Q4 25 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.3% | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.4% | 3.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.3% | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.2% | 1.7% |
| Q4 25 | 18.00× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.30× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.06× | 2.10× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -4.65× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.48× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.68× | 3.14× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.88× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.83× | -22.10× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CE
| Engineered Materials | $1.3B | 58% |
| Acetyl Chain | $940.0M | 43% |
SWK
| Tools And Outdoor Segment | $3.3B | 87% |
| Engineered Fastening Segment | $500.5M | 13% |
