vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Freeport-McMoRan (FCX) and Stanley Black & Decker (SWK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Freeport-McMoRan is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($5.3B vs $3.8B, roughly 1.4× Stanley Black & Decker). Freeport-McMoRan runs the higher net margin — 10.7% vs 1.4%, a 9.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Stanley Black & Decker posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (0.1% vs -10.4%). Stanley Black & Decker produced more free cash flow last quarter ($155.3M vs $-312.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Stanley Black & Decker's revenue compounded faster (0.3% CAGR vs -7.9%).
Freeport-McMoRan Inc., often called Freeport, is an American mining company based in the Freeport-McMoRan Center, in Phoenix, Arizona. The company is the world's largest producer of molybdenum, a major copper producer and operates the world's largest gold mine, the Grasberg mine in Papua, Indonesia.
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc., formerly known as The Stanley Works, is an American manufacturer of industrial tools and household hardware, and a provider of security products. Headquartered in the Greater Hartford city of New Britain, Connecticut, Stanley Black & Decker is the result of the merger of The Stanley Works and Black & Decker on March 12, 2010.
FCX vs SWK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $5.3B | $3.8B |
| Net Profit | $565.0M | $51.4M |
| Gross Margin | 12.4% | 31.4% |
| Operating Margin | 15.4% | — |
| Net Margin | 10.7% | 1.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -10.4% | 0.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -21.6% | -43.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.34 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $5.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.8B | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.5B | $3.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.6B | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.9B | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.7B | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.4B | $4.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.2B | $3.9B |
| Q4 25 | $565.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $51.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $101.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $793.0M | $90.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $721.0M | $194.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $91.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $-11.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | $19.5M |
| Q4 25 | 12.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.2% | 31.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 34.2% | 27.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.3% | 29.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 27.0% | 30.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.0% | 29.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.5% | 28.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 28.5% | 28.6% |
| Q4 25 | 15.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 28.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 32.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.1% | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.0% | 10.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 32.0% | 9.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 26.3% | 8.3% |
| Q4 25 | 10.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.3% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.6% | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.2% | 2.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.3% | 5.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.5% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.0% | -0.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 18.7% | 0.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.46 | $0.34 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.53 | $0.67 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.24 | $0.60 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.29 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.36 | $0.60 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.42 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.32 | $0.13 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $3.8B | $268.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $9.4B | $5.3B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $18.9B | $9.0B |
| Total Assets | $58.2B | $21.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.50× | 0.59× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.3B | $268.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.5B | $311.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.4B | $344.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.9B | $290.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.0B | $298.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.3B | $318.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.2B | $476.6M |
| Q4 25 | $9.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $5.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.4B | $5.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.9B | $6.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.7B | $6.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.4B | $6.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.4B | $6.1B |
| Q4 25 | $18.9B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.7B | $9.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.2B | $9.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.7B | $8.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.6B | $8.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.5B | $8.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.4B | $8.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.0B | $8.9B |
| Q4 25 | $58.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $56.8B | $21.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $56.5B | $22.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $56.0B | $22.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $54.8B | $21.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $55.4B | $22.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $54.6B | $22.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $54.2B | $23.9B |
| Q4 25 | 0.50× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.59× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.62× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.53× | 0.63× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.51× | 0.70× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.55× | 0.69× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.54× | 0.70× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.56× | 0.69× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $693.0M | $221.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-312.0M | $155.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -5.9% | 4.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 19.1% | 1.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.23× | 4.30× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.1B | $369.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $693.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $221.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $214.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $-420.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $679.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9B | $285.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $573.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.9B | $-431.0M |
| Q4 25 | $-312.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $608.0M | $155.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $934.0M | $134.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-114.0M | $-485.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $197.0M | $564.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $673.0M | $199.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $840.0M | $485.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $642.0M | $-496.7M |
| Q4 25 | -5.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.9% | 4.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.4% | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.0% | -13.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.4% | 15.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.1% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.1% | 12.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.3% | -12.8% |
| Q4 25 | 19.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.5% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.8% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.0% | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.1% | 3.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.9% | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.4% | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.2% | 1.7% |
| Q4 25 | 1.23× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.33× | 4.30× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.42× | 2.10× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.33× | -4.65× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.99× | 3.48× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.51× | 3.14× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.53× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.63× | -22.10× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FCX
| Morenci | $2.5B | 47% |
| Grasberg Segment | $964.0M | 18% |
| Copper In Concentrates | $934.0M | 18% |
| Molybdenum | $541.0M | 10% |
| Gold | $388.0M | 7% |
SWK
| Tools And Outdoor Segment | $3.3B | 87% |
| Engineered Fastening Segment | $500.5M | 13% |