vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Celanese Corp (CE) and MARRIOTT VACATIONS WORLDWIDE Corp (VAC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Celanese Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.2B vs $1.2B, roughly 1.8× MARRIOTT VACATIONS WORLDWIDE Corp). Celanese Corp runs the higher net margin — 0.6% vs -35.0%, a 35.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, MARRIOTT VACATIONS WORLDWIDE Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-0.7% vs -7.0%). Celanese Corp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($168.0M vs $-6.0M). Over the past eight quarters, MARRIOTT VACATIONS WORLDWIDE Corp's revenue compounded faster (5.2% CAGR vs -8.1%).
Celanese Corporation, formerly known as Hoechst Celanese, is an American technology and specialty materials company headquartered in Irving, Texas. It is a Fortune 500 corporation. The company is the world's leading producer of acetic acid, producing about 1.95 million tonnes per year, representing approximately 20% of global production. Celanese is also the world's largest producer of vinyl acetate monomer (VAM).
Marriott Vacations Worldwide Corporation is a pure-play public timeshare company. Formerly a division of Marriott International, Marriott Vacations Worldwide was established as a separate, publicly traded entity focusing primarily on vacation ownership in November 2011. Marriott Vacations Worldwide runs more than 120 resorts with over 700,000 Owners and members in a diverse portfolio of brands under The Marriott Vacation Clubs name. Its brands include Marriott Vacation Club, The Marriott Vaca...
CE vs VAC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.2B | $1.2B |
| Net Profit | $14.0M | $-431.0M |
| Gross Margin | 19.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | 4.0% | — |
| Net Margin | 0.6% | -35.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -7.0% | -0.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 100.7% | -962.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.13 | $-12.00 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6B | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | $14.0M | $-431.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.4B | $-2.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $199.0M | $69.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-21.0M | $56.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.9B | $50.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.0M | $84.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $155.0M | $37.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $121.0M | $47.0M |
| Q4 25 | 19.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 21.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -52.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -59.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | -35.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -56.1% | -0.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.9% | 6.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.9% | 5.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -80.8% | 4.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.4% | 6.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.8% | 3.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.6% | 4.2% |
| Q4 25 | $0.13 | $-12.00 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-12.39 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.81 | $1.77 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.19 | $1.46 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-17.50 | $1.29 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.06 | $2.12 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.41 | $0.98 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.10 | $1.22 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $406.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $11.4B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.0B | $2.0B |
| Total Assets | $21.7B | $9.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.81× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $406.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $474.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $205.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $196.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $197.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $197.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $206.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $237.0M |
| Q4 25 | $11.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.7B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.7B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.4B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.3B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.1B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.0B | — |
| Q4 25 | $4.0B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0B | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3B | $2.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.2B | $2.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.2B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.3B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.2B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.1B | $2.4B |
| Q4 25 | $21.7B | $9.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.2B | $10.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.7B | $9.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.2B | $9.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.9B | $9.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.9B | $9.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.8B | $9.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $26.0B | $9.9B |
| Q4 25 | 2.81× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.95× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.41× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.39× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.14× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.56× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.54× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.56× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $252.0M | $6.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $168.0M | $-6.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.6% | -0.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.8% | 1.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 18.00× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $803.0M | $-29.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $252.0M | $6.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $447.0M | $62.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $410.0M | $-48.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $37.0M | $8.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $494.0M | $100.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.0M | $72.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $292.0M | $30.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $101.0M | $3.0M |
| Q4 25 | $168.0M | $-6.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $383.0M | $51.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $317.0M | $-68.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-65.0M | $-6.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $389.0M | $86.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.0M | $58.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $187.0M | $17.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-36.0M | $-13.0M |
| Q4 25 | 7.6% | -0.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.8% | 4.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.5% | -5.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.7% | -0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.4% | 6.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.3% | 4.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.1% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.4% | -1.2% |
| Q4 25 | 3.8% | 1.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.3% | 1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.4% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.3% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | 1.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.2% | 1.4% |
| Q4 25 | 18.00× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.06× | -0.70× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.14× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.00× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.68× | 0.86× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.88× | 0.81× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.83× | 0.06× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CE
| Engineered Materials | $1.3B | 58% |
| Acetyl Chain | $940.0M | 43% |
VAC
| Cost Reimbursement | $467.0M | 38% |
| Time Share | $381.0M | 31% |
| Management And Exchange | $212.0M | 17% |
| Ancillary Revenues | $64.0M | 5% |
| Management Service | $55.0M | 4% |
| Service Other | $36.0M | 3% |
