vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH) and Essex Property Trust (ESS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Celsius Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($721.6M vs $479.6M, roughly 1.5× Essex Property Trust). Essex Property Trust runs the higher net margin — 17.9% vs 3.4%, a 14.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Celsius Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (117.2% vs 5.5%). Over the past eight quarters, Celsius Holdings, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (42.4% CAGR vs 6.0%).

Celsius Holdings, Inc. is an American company that produces a range of fitness and energy drinks under the brand name Celsius. The company's products are marketed as healthy, to which the CEO attributes the brand's success.

Essex Property Trust is a publicly traded real estate investment trust that invests in apartments in California and in the Seattle metropolitan area.

CELH vs ESS — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
CELH
CELH
1.5× larger
CELH
$721.6M
$479.6M
ESS
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
CELH
CELH
+111.7% gap
CELH
117.2%
5.5%
ESS
Higher net margin
ESS
ESS
14.4% more per $
ESS
17.9%
3.4%
CELH
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
CELH
CELH
Annualised
CELH
42.4%
6.0%
ESS

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
CELH
CELH
ESS
ESS
Revenue
$721.6M
$479.6M
Net Profit
$24.7M
$85.7M
Gross Margin
47.4%
70.0%
Operating Margin
3.6%
31.7%
Net Margin
3.4%
17.9%
Revenue YoY
117.2%
5.5%
Net Profit YoY
231.1%
-71.6%
EPS (diluted)
$0.04
$1.24

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
CELH
CELH
ESS
ESS
Q4 25
$721.6M
$479.6M
Q3 25
$725.1M
$473.3M
Q2 25
$739.3M
$469.8M
Q1 25
$329.3M
$464.6M
Q4 24
$332.2M
$454.5M
Q3 24
$265.7M
$450.7M
Q2 24
$402.0M
$442.4M
Q1 24
$355.7M
$426.9M
Net Profit
CELH
CELH
ESS
ESS
Q4 25
$24.7M
$85.7M
Q3 25
$-61.0M
$172.7M
Q2 25
$99.9M
$231.5M
Q1 25
$44.4M
$212.8M
Q4 24
$-18.9M
$301.7M
Q3 24
$6.4M
$125.5M
Q2 24
$79.8M
$99.0M
Q1 24
$77.8M
$285.1M
Gross Margin
CELH
CELH
ESS
ESS
Q4 25
47.4%
70.0%
Q3 25
51.3%
69.2%
Q2 25
51.5%
70.7%
Q1 25
52.3%
69.6%
Q4 24
50.2%
70.0%
Q3 24
46.0%
69.5%
Q2 24
52.0%
70.8%
Q1 24
51.2%
69.7%
Operating Margin
CELH
CELH
ESS
ESS
Q4 25
3.6%
31.7%
Q3 25
-11.0%
44.5%
Q2 25
19.3%
59.5%
Q1 25
15.8%
55.3%
Q4 24
-5.6%
67.0%
Q3 24
-1.2%
28.6%
Q2 24
23.4%
31.1%
Q1 24
23.4%
31.0%
Net Margin
CELH
CELH
ESS
ESS
Q4 25
3.4%
17.9%
Q3 25
-8.4%
36.5%
Q2 25
13.5%
49.3%
Q1 25
13.5%
45.8%
Q4 24
-5.7%
66.4%
Q3 24
2.4%
27.8%
Q2 24
19.8%
22.4%
Q1 24
21.9%
66.8%
EPS (diluted)
CELH
CELH
ESS
ESS
Q4 25
$0.04
$1.24
Q3 25
$-0.27
$2.56
Q2 25
$0.33
$3.44
Q1 25
$0.15
$3.16
Q4 24
$-0.10
$4.00
Q3 24
$0.00
$1.84
Q2 24
$0.28
$1.45
Q1 24
$0.27
$4.25

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
CELH
CELH
ESS
ESS
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$398.9M
$76.2M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$676.9M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$1.2B
$5.5B
Total Assets
$5.1B
$13.2B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.57×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
CELH
CELH
ESS
ESS
Q4 25
$398.9M
$76.2M
Q3 25
$806.0M
$66.0M
Q2 25
$615.2M
$58.7M
Q1 25
$977.3M
$98.7M
Q4 24
$890.2M
$66.8M
Q3 24
$903.7M
$71.3M
Q2 24
$903.2M
$55.2M
Q1 24
$879.5M
$499.0M
Total Debt
CELH
CELH
ESS
ESS
Q4 25
$676.9M
Q3 25
$870.5M
$6.4B
Q2 25
$871.9M
$6.4B
Q1 25
$6.8B
Q4 24
Q3 24
$6.4B
Q2 24
$6.2B
Q1 24
$6.6B
Stockholders' Equity
CELH
CELH
ESS
ESS
Q4 25
$1.2B
$5.5B
Q3 25
$1.2B
$5.6B
Q2 25
$1.3B
$5.6B
Q1 25
$443.1M
$5.6B
Q4 24
$399.9M
$5.5B
Q3 24
$423.6M
$5.4B
Q2 24
$415.8M
$5.5B
Q1 24
$338.2M
$5.5B
Total Assets
CELH
CELH
ESS
ESS
Q4 25
$5.1B
$13.2B
Q3 25
$5.3B
$13.2B
Q2 25
$3.8B
$13.2B
Q1 25
$1.9B
$13.2B
Q4 24
$1.8B
$12.9B
Q3 24
$1.7B
$12.6B
Q2 24
$1.7B
$12.5B
Q1 24
$1.6B
$12.9B
Debt / Equity
CELH
CELH
ESS
ESS
Q4 25
0.57×
Q3 25
0.72×
1.15×
Q2 25
0.69×
1.14×
Q1 25
1.22×
Q4 24
Q3 24
1.18×
Q2 24
1.13×
Q1 24
1.19×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
CELH
CELH
ESS
ESS
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$-119.4M
$1.1B
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$-130.0M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
-18.0%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
1.5%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
-4.83×
12.53×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$323.4M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
CELH
CELH
ESS
ESS
Q4 25
$-119.4M
$1.1B
Q3 25
$331.8M
$342.6M
Q2 25
$43.7M
$216.1M
Q1 25
$103.4M
$281.5M
Q4 24
$75.7M
$1.1B
Q3 24
$12.9M
$316.2M
Q2 24
$39.6M
$218.9M
Q1 24
$134.6M
$314.9M
Free Cash Flow
CELH
CELH
ESS
ESS
Q4 25
$-130.0M
Q3 25
$321.5M
Q2 25
$35.5M
Q1 25
$96.4M
Q4 24
$70.3M
Q3 24
$8.7M
Q2 24
$30.4M
Q1 24
$130.1M
FCF Margin
CELH
CELH
ESS
ESS
Q4 25
-18.0%
Q3 25
44.3%
Q2 25
4.8%
Q1 25
29.3%
Q4 24
21.2%
Q3 24
3.3%
Q2 24
7.6%
Q1 24
36.6%
Capex Intensity
CELH
CELH
ESS
ESS
Q4 25
1.5%
Q3 25
1.4%
Q2 25
1.1%
Q1 25
2.1%
Q4 24
1.6%
Q3 24
1.6%
Q2 24
2.3%
Q1 24
1.3%
Cash Conversion
CELH
CELH
ESS
ESS
Q4 25
-4.83×
12.53×
Q3 25
1.98×
Q2 25
0.44×
0.93×
Q1 25
2.33×
1.32×
Q4 24
3.54×
Q3 24
2.03×
2.52×
Q2 24
0.50×
2.21×
Q1 24
1.73×
1.10×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Related Comparisons