vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH) and Fabrinet (FN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Fabrinet is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.1B vs $721.6M, roughly 1.6× Celsius Holdings, Inc.). Fabrinet runs the higher net margin — 9.9% vs 3.4%, a 6.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Celsius Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (117.2% vs 35.9%). Fabrinet produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-5.3M vs $-130.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Celsius Holdings, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (42.4% CAGR vs 24.4%).
Celsius Holdings, Inc. is an American company that produces a range of fitness and energy drinks under the brand name Celsius. The company's products are marketed as healthy, to which the CEO attributes the brand's success.
FabrinetFNEarnings & Financial Report
Below is a list of companies having stocks that are included in the S&P MidCap 400 stock market index. The index, maintained by S&P Dow Jones Indices, comprises the common stocks of 400 mid-cap, mostly American, companies. Although called the S&P 400, the index sometimes contains more than 400 stocks when it includes two or more share classes of stock from one of its component companies.
CELH vs FN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $721.6M | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $24.7M | $112.6M |
| Gross Margin | 47.4% | 12.2% |
| Operating Margin | 3.6% | 10.1% |
| Net Margin | 3.4% | 9.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 117.2% | 35.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 231.1% | 30.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.04 | $3.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $721.6M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $725.1M | $978.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $739.3M | $909.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $329.3M | $871.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $332.2M | $833.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $265.7M | $804.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $402.0M | $753.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $355.7M | $731.5M |
| Q4 25 | $24.7M | $112.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-61.0M | $95.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $99.9M | $87.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $44.4M | $81.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-18.9M | $86.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.4M | $77.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $79.8M | $81.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $77.8M | $80.9M |
| Q4 25 | 47.4% | 12.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 51.3% | 11.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 51.5% | 12.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 52.3% | 11.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 50.2% | 12.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 46.0% | 12.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 52.0% | 12.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 51.2% | 12.4% |
| Q4 25 | 3.6% | 10.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -11.0% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.3% | 9.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.8% | 9.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.6% | 9.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.2% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.4% | 9.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 23.4% | 9.7% |
| Q4 25 | 3.4% | 9.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -8.4% | 9.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.5% | 9.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.5% | 9.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.7% | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.4% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.8% | 10.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 21.9% | 11.1% |
| Q4 25 | $0.04 | $3.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.27 | $2.66 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.33 | $2.41 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.15 | $2.25 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.10 | $2.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.00 | $2.13 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.28 | $2.22 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.27 | $2.21 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $398.9M | $960.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $676.9M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | $2.2B |
| Total Assets | $5.1B | $3.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.57× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $398.9M | $960.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $806.0M | $968.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $615.2M | $934.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $977.3M | $950.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $890.2M | $934.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $903.7M | $908.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $903.2M | $858.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $879.5M | $794.0M |
| Q4 25 | $676.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $870.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $871.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $443.1M | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $399.9M | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $423.6M | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $415.8M | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $338.2M | $1.7B |
| Q4 25 | $5.1B | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.3B | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.8B | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.6B | $2.2B |
| Q4 25 | 0.57× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.72× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.69× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-119.4M | $46.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-130.0M | $-5.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -18.0% | -0.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.5% | 4.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -4.83× | 0.41× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $323.4M | $102.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-119.4M | $46.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $331.8M | $102.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $43.7M | $55.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $103.4M | $74.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $75.7M | $115.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.9M | $83.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $39.6M | $83.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $134.6M | $100.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-130.0M | $-5.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $321.5M | $57.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.5M | $4.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $96.4M | $45.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $70.3M | $94.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.7M | $62.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.4M | $70.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $130.1M | $87.3M |
| Q4 25 | -18.0% | -0.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 44.3% | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.8% | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.3% | 5.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.2% | 11.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.3% | 7.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.6% | 9.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 36.6% | 11.9% |
| Q4 25 | 1.5% | 4.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | 4.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | 5.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.1% | 3.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.6% | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.6% | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.3% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.3% | 1.9% |
| Q4 25 | -4.83× | 0.41× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.07× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.44× | 0.63× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.33× | 0.91× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.34× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.03× | 1.07× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.50× | 1.02× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.73× | 1.25× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CELH
Segment breakdown not available.
FN
| Optical Communications | $832.6M | 73% |
| Non Optical Communications | $300.3M | 27% |
