vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH) and OPEN TEXT CORP (OTEX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
OPEN TEXT CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.3B vs $721.6M, roughly 1.8× Celsius Holdings, Inc.). OPEN TEXT CORP runs the higher net margin — 13.5% vs 3.4%, a 10.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Celsius Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (117.2% vs 2.2%). OPEN TEXT CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($305.0M vs $-130.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Celsius Holdings, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (42.4% CAGR vs -3.0%).
Celsius Holdings, Inc. is an American company that produces a range of fitness and energy drinks under the brand name Celsius. The company's products are marketed as healthy, to which the CEO attributes the brand's success.
Open Text Corporation is a global software company that develops and sells information management software.
CELH vs OTEX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $721.6M | $1.3B |
| Net Profit | $24.7M | $172.7M |
| Gross Margin | 47.4% | 73.1% |
| Operating Margin | 3.6% | 15.7% |
| Net Margin | 3.4% | 13.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 117.2% | 2.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 231.1% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.04 | $0.70 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $721.6M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $725.1M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $739.3M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $329.3M | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $332.2M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $265.7M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $402.0M | $1.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | $172.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $24.7M | $168.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-61.0M | $146.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $99.9M | $28.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $44.4M | $92.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-18.9M | $229.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.4M | $84.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $79.8M | $248.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | 73.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 47.4% | 74.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 51.3% | 72.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 51.5% | 72.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 52.3% | 71.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 50.2% | 73.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 46.0% | 71.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 52.0% | 72.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 15.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.6% | 22.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -11.0% | 21.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.3% | 13.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.8% | 16.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.6% | 22.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.2% | 16.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.4% | 14.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | 13.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.4% | 12.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -8.4% | 11.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.5% | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.5% | 7.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.7% | 17.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.4% | 6.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.8% | 18.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.70 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.04 | $0.66 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.27 | $0.58 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.33 | $0.11 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.15 | $0.35 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.10 | $0.87 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.00 | $0.32 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.28 | $0.91 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $398.9M | $1.3B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $676.9M | $6.2B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | $4.0B |
| Total Assets | $5.1B | $13.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.57× | 1.57× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $398.9M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $806.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $615.2M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $977.3M | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $890.2M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $903.7M | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $903.2M | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | $6.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $676.9M | $6.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $870.5M | $6.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $871.9M | $6.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $6.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $6.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $6.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $3.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $443.1M | $4.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $399.9M | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $423.6M | $4.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $415.8M | $4.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | $13.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.1B | $13.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.3B | $13.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.8B | $13.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $13.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $13.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $13.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $14.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.57× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.57× | 1.58× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.72× | 1.61× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.69× | 1.62× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.55× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.51× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.55× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.52× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-119.4M | $354.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-130.0M | $305.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -18.0% | 23.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.5% | 3.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -4.83× | 2.05× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $323.4M | $809.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $354.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-119.4M | $318.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $331.8M | $147.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $43.7M | $158.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $103.4M | $402.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $75.7M | $348.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.9M | $-77.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $39.6M | $185.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $305.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-130.0M | $279.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $321.5M | $101.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.5M | $124.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $96.4M | $373.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $70.3M | $306.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.7M | $-117.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.4M | $145.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | 23.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | -18.0% | 21.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 44.3% | 7.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.8% | 9.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.3% | 29.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.2% | 23.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.3% | -9.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.6% | 10.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.5% | 3.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.1% | 2.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.6% | 3.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.6% | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.3% | 2.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | 2.05× | ||
| Q4 25 | -4.83× | 1.90× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.01× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.44× | 5.49× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.33× | 4.33× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.51× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.03× | -0.92× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.50× | 0.75× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CELH
Segment breakdown not available.
OTEX
| Customer support | $564.8M | 44% |
| Cloud services and subscriptions | $492.9M | 38% |
| License | $145.1M | 11% |
| Professional service and other | $79.6M | 6% |