vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH) and PROSPERITY BANCSHARES INC (PB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Celsius Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($721.6M vs $367.6M, roughly 2.0× PROSPERITY BANCSHARES INC). PROSPERITY BANCSHARES INC runs the higher net margin — 31.6% vs 3.4%, a 28.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. Over the past eight quarters, Celsius Holdings, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (42.4% CAGR vs 19.2%).
Celsius Holdings, Inc. is an American company that produces a range of fitness and energy drinks under the brand name Celsius. The company's products are marketed as healthy, to which the CEO attributes the brand's success.
Prosperity Bancshares, Inc. is a bank holding company headquartered in Houston, Texas with operations in Texas and central Oklahoma. As of December 31, 2019, the company operated 285 branches: 65 in the Houston area, including The Woodlands, Texas; 30 in South Texas, including Corpus Christi, Texas and Victoria, Texas; 75 in the Dallas–Fort Worth metroplex; 22 in East Texas; 29 in Central Texas, including Austin, Texas and San Antonio; 34 in West Texas, including Lubbock, Texas, Midland–Odess...
CELH vs PB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $721.6M | $367.6M |
| Net Profit | $24.7M | $116.3M |
| Gross Margin | 47.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | 3.6% | — |
| Net Margin | 3.4% | 31.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 117.2% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 231.1% | -10.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.04 | $1.16 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $367.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $721.6M | $275.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $725.1M | $273.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $739.3M | $267.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $329.3M | $265.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $332.2M | $267.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $265.7M | $261.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $402.0M | $258.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | $116.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $24.7M | $139.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-61.0M | $137.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $99.9M | $135.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $44.4M | $130.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-18.9M | $130.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.4M | $127.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $79.8M | $111.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 47.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 51.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 51.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 52.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 50.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 46.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 52.0% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.6% | 65.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -11.0% | 64.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.3% | 64.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.8% | 62.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.6% | 62.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.2% | 62.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.4% | 55.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | 31.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.4% | 50.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -8.4% | 50.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.5% | 50.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.5% | 49.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.7% | 48.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.4% | 48.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.8% | 43.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.16 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.04 | $1.48 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.27 | $1.45 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.33 | $1.42 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.15 | $1.37 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.10 | $1.36 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.00 | $1.34 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.28 | $1.17 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $398.9M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $676.9M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | $8.2B |
| Total Assets | $5.1B | $43.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.57× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $398.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $806.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $615.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $977.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $890.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $903.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $903.2M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $676.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $870.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $871.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $8.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $7.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $7.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $7.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $443.1M | $7.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $399.9M | $7.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $423.6M | $7.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $415.8M | $7.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | $43.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.1B | $38.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.3B | $38.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.8B | $38.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $38.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $39.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $40.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $39.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.57× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.72× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.69× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-119.4M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-130.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -18.0% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.5% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -4.83× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $323.4M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-119.4M | $78.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $331.8M | $194.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $43.7M | $98.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $103.4M | $178.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $75.7M | $-205.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.9M | $274.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $39.6M | $216.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-130.0M | $68.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $321.5M | $185.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.5M | $91.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $96.4M | $171.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $70.3M | $-210.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.7M | $270.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.4M | $211.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -18.0% | 24.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 44.3% | 67.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.8% | 34.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.3% | 64.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.2% | -78.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.3% | 103.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.6% | 81.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.5% | 3.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.1% | 2.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.6% | 1.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.6% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.3% | 1.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -4.83× | 0.56× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.42× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.44× | 0.73× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.33× | 1.37× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -1.58× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.03× | 2.16× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.50× | 1.94× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CELH
Segment breakdown not available.
PB
| Net Interest Income | $321.1M | 87% |
| Noninterest Income | $46.5M | 13% |
