vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH) and Ralliant Corp (RAL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Celsius Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($721.6M vs $554.6M, roughly 1.3× Ralliant Corp). Celsius Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 3.4% vs -220.4%, a 223.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Celsius Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (117.2% vs 1.2%).
Celsius Holdings, Inc. is an American company that produces a range of fitness and energy drinks under the brand name Celsius. The company's products are marketed as healthy, to which the CEO attributes the brand's success.
CELH vs RAL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $721.6M | $554.6M |
| Net Profit | $24.7M | $-1.2B |
| Gross Margin | 47.4% | 50.5% |
| Operating Margin | 3.6% | — |
| Net Margin | 3.4% | -220.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 117.2% | 1.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 231.1% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.04 | $-12.10 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $554.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $721.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $725.1M | $529.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $739.3M | $503.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $329.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $332.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $265.7M | $531.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $402.0M | $533.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-1.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $24.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-61.0M | $39.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $99.9M | $47.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $44.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-18.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.4M | $90.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $79.8M | $64.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | 50.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 47.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 51.3% | 50.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 51.5% | 49.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 52.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 50.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 46.0% | 52.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 52.0% | 51.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -11.0% | 9.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.3% | 11.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.2% | 20.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.4% | 19.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | -220.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -8.4% | 7.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.5% | 9.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.4% | 17.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.8% | 12.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | $-12.10 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.04 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.27 | $0.35 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.33 | $0.42 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.15 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.10 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.00 | $0.81 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.28 | $0.57 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $398.9M | $318.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $676.9M | $1.1B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | $1.6B |
| Total Assets | $5.1B | $3.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.57× | 0.70× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $318.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $398.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $806.0M | $264.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $615.2M | $198.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $977.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $890.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $903.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $903.2M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $676.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $870.5M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $871.9M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $3.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $443.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $399.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $423.6M | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $415.8M | $4.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.3B | $5.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.8B | $5.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.70× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.57× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.72× | 0.39× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.69× | 0.38× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-119.4M | $397.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-130.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -18.0% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.5% | 1.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -4.83× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $323.4M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $397.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-119.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $331.8M | $138.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $43.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $103.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $75.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $39.6M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-130.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $321.5M | $126.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $96.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $70.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.4M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -18.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 44.3% | 23.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -4.83× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.47× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.44× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.33× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.03× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.50× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
