vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Ralliant Corp (RAL) and Roper Technologies (ROP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Roper Technologies is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.1B vs $529.1M, roughly 4.0× Ralliant Corp). Roper Technologies runs the higher net margin — 15.8% vs 7.5%, a 8.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Roper Technologies posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.3% vs -0.5%). Roper Technologies produced more free cash flow last quarter ($507.0M vs $126.6M).
Roper Technologies, Inc. is a holding company that owns companies in the technology sector.
RAL vs ROP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 2025 vs Q1 2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $529.1M | $2.1B |
| Net Profit | $39.9M | $331.0M |
| Gross Margin | 50.8% | 69.4% |
| Operating Margin | 9.8% | 27.2% |
| Net Margin | 7.5% | 15.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -0.5% | 11.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -56.1% | 842.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.35 | $4.87 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $529.1M | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $503.3M | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $531.7M | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $533.7M | $1.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | $331.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $428.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $39.9M | $398.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $47.6M | $378.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $331.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $462.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $90.9M | $367.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $64.8M | $337.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | 69.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 69.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 50.8% | 69.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 49.3% | 69.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 68.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 68.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 52.6% | 69.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 51.5% | 69.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 27.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 28.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.8% | 28.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.7% | 28.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 27.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.9% | 28.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.7% | 28.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 15.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 20.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.5% | 19.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.5% | 19.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 17.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 24.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.1% | 20.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.1% | 19.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.87 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $3.97 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.35 | $3.68 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.42 | $3.49 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.06 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.29 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.81 | $3.40 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.57 | $3.12 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $264.2M | $382.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.1B | $9.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.0B | $18.8B |
| Total Assets | $5.3B | $34.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.39× | 0.52× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $382.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $297.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $264.2M | $320.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $198.6M | $242.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $372.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $188.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $269.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $251.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $9.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $9.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $7.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $18.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $19.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0B | $20.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.0B | $19.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $19.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $18.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0B | $18.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.0B | $18.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | $34.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $34.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.3B | $34.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.2B | $33.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $31.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $31.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $31.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $29.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.52× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.47× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.39× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.38× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.40× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $138.6M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $126.6M | $507.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 23.9% | 24.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.3% | 0.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.47× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $738.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $138.6M | $869.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $404.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $528.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $722.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $755.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $384.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $507.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $126.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 24.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.72× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.47× | 2.18× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.07× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.60× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.56× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.05× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.14× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
RAL
| Industrial Manufacturing | $111.1M | 21% |
| Defense And Space | $93.6M | 18% |
| Diversified Electronics | $91.0M | 17% |
| Test And Measurement | $76.8M | 15% |
| Communications | $60.7M | 11% |
| Semiconductors | $51.4M | 10% |
| Other Direct End Markets | $44.4M | 8% |
ROP
Segment breakdown not available.
