vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH) and SCANSOURCE, INC. (SCSC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SCANSOURCE, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($766.5M vs $721.6M, roughly 1.1× Celsius Holdings, Inc.). Celsius Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 3.4% vs 2.2%, a 1.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Celsius Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (117.2% vs 2.5%). SCANSOURCE, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($28.9M vs $-130.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Celsius Holdings, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (42.4% CAGR vs 0.9%).
Celsius Holdings, Inc. is an American company that produces a range of fitness and energy drinks under the brand name Celsius. The company's products are marketed as healthy, to which the CEO attributes the brand's success.
ScanSource, Inc. is a leading global specialty technology distributor offering a broad portfolio of solutions including point-of-sale systems, barcode scanning tools, cybersecurity products, cloud services and communication solutions. It primarily serves value-added resellers, managed service providers and enterprise clients across North America, Latin America and Europe, covering retail, healthcare, industrial and public sector core segments.
CELH vs SCSC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $721.6M | $766.5M |
| Net Profit | $24.7M | $16.5M |
| Gross Margin | 47.4% | 13.4% |
| Operating Margin | 3.6% | 2.3% |
| Net Margin | 3.4% | 2.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 117.2% | 2.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 231.1% | -3.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.04 | $0.75 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $721.6M | $766.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $725.1M | $739.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $739.3M | $812.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $329.3M | $704.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $332.2M | $747.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $265.7M | $775.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $402.0M | $746.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $355.7M | $752.6M |
| Q4 25 | $24.7M | $16.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-61.0M | $19.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $99.9M | $20.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $44.4M | $17.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-18.9M | $17.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.4M | $17.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $79.8M | $16.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $77.8M | $12.8M |
| Q4 25 | 47.4% | 13.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 51.3% | 14.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 51.5% | 12.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 52.3% | 14.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 50.2% | 13.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 46.0% | 13.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 52.0% | 13.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 51.2% | 12.6% |
| Q4 25 | 3.6% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -11.0% | 3.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.3% | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.8% | 3.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.6% | 2.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.2% | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.4% | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 23.4% | 2.3% |
| Q4 25 | 3.4% | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -8.4% | 2.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.5% | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.5% | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.7% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.4% | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.8% | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 21.9% | 1.7% |
| Q4 25 | $0.04 | $0.75 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.27 | $0.89 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.33 | $0.87 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.15 | $0.74 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.10 | $0.70 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.00 | $0.69 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.28 | $0.66 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.27 | $0.50 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $398.9M | $83.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $676.9M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | $910.9M |
| Total Assets | $5.1B | $1.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.57× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $398.9M | $83.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $806.0M | $124.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $615.2M | $126.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $977.3M | $146.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $890.2M | $110.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $903.7M | $145.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $903.2M | $185.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $879.5M | $159.1M |
| Q4 25 | $676.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $870.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $871.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $910.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $914.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $906.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $443.1M | $901.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $399.9M | $900.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $423.6M | $920.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $415.8M | $924.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $338.2M | $944.1M |
| Q4 25 | $5.1B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.3B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.8B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.6B | $1.8B |
| Q4 25 | 0.57× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.72× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.69× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-119.4M | $30.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-130.0M | $28.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -18.0% | 3.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.5% | 0.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -4.83× | 1.87× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $323.4M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-119.4M | $30.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $331.8M | $23.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $43.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $103.4M | $66.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $75.7M | $-6.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.9M | $44.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $39.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $134.6M | $160.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-130.0M | $28.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $321.5M | $20.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $96.4M | $64.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $70.3M | $-8.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.7M | $42.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $130.1M | $157.7M |
| Q4 25 | -18.0% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 44.3% | 2.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.3% | 9.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.2% | -1.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.3% | 5.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 36.6% | 21.0% |
| Q4 25 | 1.5% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.1% | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.6% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.6% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.3% | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.3% | 0.3% |
| Q4 25 | -4.83× | 1.87× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.44× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.33× | 3.79× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -0.36× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.03× | 2.64× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.50× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.73× | 12.51× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CELH
Segment breakdown not available.
SCSC
| Products And Services | $723.4M | 94% |
| Intelisys Advisory | $25.0M | 3% |
| Recurring Revenue | $18.2M | 2% |
