vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH) and SEALED AIR CORP (SEE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SEALED AIR CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.4B vs $721.6M, roughly 1.9× Celsius Holdings, Inc.). Celsius Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 3.4% vs 3.1%, a 0.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Celsius Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (117.2% vs 2.6%). SEALED AIR CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($257.7M vs $-130.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Celsius Holdings, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (42.4% CAGR vs 2.7%).
Celsius Holdings, Inc. is an American company that produces a range of fitness and energy drinks under the brand name Celsius. The company's products are marketed as healthy, to which the CEO attributes the brand's success.
Sealed Air Corporation is a global provider of innovative packaging and protective solutions. Its core offerings include cushioning materials, food safety and preservation packaging, and sustainable waste-reducing packaging systems, serving retail, e-commerce, food and beverage, and industrial manufacturing markets worldwide.
CELH vs SEE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $721.6M | $1.4B |
| Net Profit | $24.7M | $43.8M |
| Gross Margin | 47.4% | 28.6% |
| Operating Margin | 3.6% | 11.4% |
| Net Margin | 3.4% | 3.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 117.2% | 2.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 231.1% | 700.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.04 | $0.30 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $721.6M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $725.1M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $739.3M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $329.3M | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $332.2M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $265.7M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $402.0M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $355.7M | $1.3B |
| Q4 25 | $24.7M | $43.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-61.0M | $255.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $99.9M | $93.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $44.4M | $113.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-18.9M | $-7.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.4M | $91.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $79.8M | $98.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $77.8M | $82.0M |
| Q4 25 | 47.4% | 28.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 51.3% | 29.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 51.5% | 30.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 52.3% | 30.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 50.2% | 30.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 46.0% | 30.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 52.0% | 31.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 51.2% | 30.3% |
| Q4 25 | 3.6% | 11.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -11.0% | 13.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.3% | 15.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.8% | 14.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.6% | 11.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.2% | 13.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.4% | 15.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 23.4% | 14.0% |
| Q4 25 | 3.4% | 3.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -8.4% | 19.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.5% | 7.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.5% | 9.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.7% | -0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.4% | 6.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.8% | 7.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 21.9% | 6.2% |
| Q4 25 | $0.04 | $0.30 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.27 | $1.73 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.33 | $0.63 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.15 | $0.77 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.10 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.00 | $0.63 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.28 | $0.67 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.27 | $0.56 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $398.9M | $344.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $676.9M | $3.3B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | $1.2B |
| Total Assets | $5.1B | $7.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.57× | 2.65× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $398.9M | $344.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $806.0M | $282.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $615.2M | $354.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $977.3M | $335.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $890.2M | $371.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $903.7M | $386.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $903.2M | $388.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $879.5M | $352.8M |
| Q4 25 | $676.9M | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $870.5M | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $871.9M | $4.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $4.5B |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $953.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $443.1M | $797.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $399.9M | $624.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $423.6M | $771.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $415.8M | $650.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $338.2M | $598.3M |
| Q4 25 | $5.1B | $7.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.3B | $7.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.8B | $7.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $7.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $7.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $7.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $7.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.6B | $7.2B |
| Q4 25 | 0.57× | 2.65× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.72× | 3.34× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.69× | 4.18× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.26× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.72× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 5.62× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.81× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 7.49× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-119.4M | $293.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-130.0M | $257.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -18.0% | 18.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.5% | 2.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -4.83× | 6.70× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $323.4M | $458.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-119.4M | $293.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $331.8M | $165.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $43.7M | $136.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $103.4M | $31.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $75.7M | $244.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.9M | $170.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $39.6M | $188.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $134.6M | $125.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-130.0M | $257.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $321.5M | $119.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.5M | $93.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $96.4M | $-12.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $70.3M | $185.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.7M | $115.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.4M | $129.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $130.1M | $78.0M |
| Q4 25 | -18.0% | 18.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 44.3% | 8.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.8% | 7.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.3% | -0.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.2% | 13.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.3% | 8.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.6% | 9.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 36.6% | 5.9% |
| Q4 25 | 1.5% | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | 3.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.1% | 3.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.6% | 4.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.6% | 4.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.3% | 4.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.3% | 3.6% |
| Q4 25 | -4.83× | 6.70× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.65× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.44× | 1.47× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.33× | 0.28× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.03× | 1.86× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.50× | 1.91× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.73× | 1.53× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CELH
Segment breakdown not available.
SEE
| Protective Segment | $1.1B | 78% |
| Other | $292.0M | 21% |
| Pension Plans Defined Benefit | $7.9M | 1% |
