vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CENTURY ALUMINUM CO (CENX) and Dexcom (DXCM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Dexcom is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.3B vs $633.7M, roughly 2.0× CENTURY ALUMINUM CO). Dexcom runs the higher net margin — 21.2% vs 0.3%, a 20.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Dexcom posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (21.6% vs 0.4%). Over the past eight quarters, CENTURY ALUMINUM CO's revenue compounded faster (13.8% CAGR vs 12.0%).
Century Aluminum Company is a US-based producer of primary aluminum, with aluminum plants in Kentucky, South Carolina and Iceland. It is the largest producer of primary aluminum in the United States. The company is a publicly held corporation listed on the NASDAQ. The headquarters is at One South Wacker in Chicago.
Dexcom, Inc. is an American multinational healthcare company that develops, manufactures, produces and distributes a line of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems for diabetes management. It operates internationally with global headquarters and R&D center in San Diego, California, U.S.A. and manufacturing facilities in Mesa, Arizona, U.S.A.; Batu Kawan, Malaysia and Athenry, County Galway, Ireland.
CENX vs DXCM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $633.7M | $1.3B |
| Net Profit | $1.8M | $267.3M |
| Gross Margin | 13.0% | 62.9% |
| Operating Margin | 5.2% | 25.6% |
| Net Margin | 0.3% | 21.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.4% | 21.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -96.0% | 153.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.03 | $0.67 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $633.7M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $632.2M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $628.1M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $633.9M | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $630.9M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $539.1M | $994.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $560.8M | $1.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | $267.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.8M | $267.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.9M | $283.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.6M | $179.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $29.7M | $105.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $45.2M | $151.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.3M | $134.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.5M | $143.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | 62.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 13.0% | 62.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.2% | 60.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.8% | 59.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.6% | 56.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.5% | 58.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.2% | 59.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.6% | 62.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | 25.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.2% | 25.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.2% | 20.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.3% | 18.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.3% | 12.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.8% | 17.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.8% | 15.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.1% | 15.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 21.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.3% | 21.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.4% | 23.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.7% | 15.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.7% | 10.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.2% | 13.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.8% | 13.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.4% | 14.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.67 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.03 | $0.67 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.15 | $0.70 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.05 | $0.45 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.29 | $0.27 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.58 | $0.37 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.46 | $0.34 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.03 | $0.35 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $134.2M | $917.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $805.6M | $2.7B |
| Total Assets | $2.3B | $6.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $917.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $134.2M | $917.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $151.4M | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $40.7M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $44.9M | $904.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.9M | $606.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $621.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $41.3M | $939.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $805.6M | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $741.8M | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $724.4M | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $726.3M | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $694.4M | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $628.5M | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $601.5M | $2.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | $6.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | $6.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $7.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $7.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | $6.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | $6.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $6.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $6.8B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $102.8M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $67.7M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 10.7% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.5% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 57.11× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $84.8M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $102.8M | $294.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0M | $659.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.9M | $303.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $72.3M | $183.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-41.4M | $301.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.1M | $199.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.5M | $279.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $67.7M | $192.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-18.1M | $579.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-15.9M | $208.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $51.1M | $96.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-54.6M | $176.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.4M | $88.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.4M | $213.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.7% | 15.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.9% | 47.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.5% | 18.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.1% | 9.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -8.7% | 15.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.4% | 8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.0% | 21.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.5% | 8.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | 6.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.8% | 8.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.3% | 8.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | 11.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.2% | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.0% | 6.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 57.11× | 1.10× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.13× | 2.33× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.69× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.43× | 1.74× | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.92× | 1.99× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.42× | 1.48× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.95× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CENX
| Aluminum | $566.3M | 89% |
| Alumina | $67.4M | 11% |
DXCM
Segment breakdown not available.
